UN nuclear inspectors have started a three-day mission to examine Iran's
atomic activities. Tehran says it's certain the talks - the first in
more than three years - will prove its program's purpose is purely
peaceful. The IAEA visit comes at a time when tensions between Iran and
the West are approaching crisis level. On Monday, EU nations adopted an
unprecedented set of sanctions against the Islamic Republic, which
include a complete embargo on oil supplies from Iran. That comes into
force in July, but Iran is considering an immediate halt of oil sales to
Europe in retaliation. RT discusses the latest development around the
Iranian crisis with Seyed Mohammad Marandi, who's a professor at the
University of Tehran.
When legislators in the US abandoned their support
of SOPA and PIPA in the wake of mass popular protest earlier this
month, many of those who had been mobilized by the legislation–which
would have granted the US government almost total power to block access
to foreign websites accused of so much as linking to copyrighted
material–did not have long to enjoy their “victory.” The very next day
the New Zealand police swooped in
to the million-dollar estate of MegaUpload.com founder Kim Dotcom,
arresting him and three others at the US government’s request for
alleged racketeering, copyright infringement and money laundering. The
Department of Justice is now seeking the MegaUpload CEO’s extradition to the US.
As a warrior for Internet freedom, you helped defeat the Stop Online
Piracy Act, or SOPA by supporting Web black outs by sites like Wikipedia
and by contacting your lawmaker to voice your displeasure. So loud was
your voice that even the president of the United States sided with you in opposing it.
But
don't take a deep sigh of relief because, after all, we're talking
about a merger of Washington, D.C., and Hollywood here, as well as
global interests. After the motion picture industry, its subsidiaries
and all "interested parties" have spent nearly $150 million lobbying for
some sort of Internet-centric "anti-piracy" bill, you should have known
the powers that be would return.
"Although
the proposed treaty's title might suggest that the agreement deals only
with counterfeit physical goods (such as medicines) what little
information has been made available publicly by negotiating governments
about the content of the treaty makes it clear that it will have a far
broader scope and in particular will deal with new tools targeting
'Internet distribution and information technology'", says an assessment
of ACTA by the watchdogs at the Electronic Freedom Foundation.
"ACTA
has several features that raise significant potential concerns for
consumers' privacy and civil liberties for innovation and the free flow
of information on the Internet [regarding] legitimate commerce and for
developing countries' ability to choose policy options that best suit
their domestic priorities and level of economic development," says EFF's
assessment.
As is usually the case with dubious,
rights-stripping legislation, ACTA - which Forbes.com reports was signed
by the U.S. in 2011 and has already been sanctioned as well by Japan,
Switzerland and many European Union nations - has largely been
negotiated in the shadows and, thus, has largely been devoid of
scrutiny... until now.
While the Obama administration was shying
away from SOPA, it has been aggressively pursuing ACTA (full disclosure:
the process was started under the Bush administration). Critics say it
is much more far-reaching than SOPA, bypassing "the sovereign laws of
participating nations" and "forcing ISP's across the globe to act as
internet police," Forbes said.
Police in Oakland, California, have used tear-gas and flash-grenades
as a 2,000-strong Occupy Oakland march turned violent, with some
protesters claiming that rubber bullets were also fired into the crowd.
At least 300 people were arrested.
The demonstrators had attempted to take over vacant buildings to use
as their headquarters, they also broke into City Hall and tried to
occupy a YMCA. Police spokesman Jeff Thomason told media most of the
arrests came around 8 pm local time. Police took many protesters into
custody as they marched through the city's downtown area, with some
entering a YMCA building.
Officials say, at one point protesters
began tearing down perimeter fences around the Henry J. Kaiser
Convention Center, as some attacked police officers, throwing rocks,
bottles and other objects. Police declared an unlawful assembly and used
force, according to the Oakland Tribune newspaper.
While police
were taking people into custody near the YMCA, about 100 officers
surrounded City Hall, while others swept the inside of the building for
protesters who had broken in. Inside the building, protesters burned
flags, broke into an electrical box and damaged several art structures,
according to Oakland Mayor Jean Quan.
“The City of Oakland
welcomes peaceful forms of assembly and freedom of speech, but acts of
violence, property destruction and overnight lodging will not be
tolerated,” the press release by city officials stated. “The
Oakland Police Department is also committed to facilitating peaceful
forms of expression while protecting personal safety and property
through ethical and constitutional policing.”
At the moment, the Occupy crowd in the city’s central square is being monitored by dozens of police officers.
Oakland
has seen one of America’s largest and most vocal Occupy protests, with
thousands of people attending since the demos started in October. Some
300 people have been arrested since then. The Occupy Wall Street
movement started in September in New York and claims to represent the 99
per cent of Americans, who suffer from corporate greed and economic
injustice.
If
you are an American or European citizen, chances are you've never heard
about shengren, minzhu and wenming. If one day you promote them, you
might even be accused of culture treason.
That's because these
are Chinese concepts. They are often conveniently translated as
"philosophers," "democracy" and "civilization." In fact, they are none
of those. They are something else. Something the West lacks in turn. But
that is irritating for most Westerners, so in the past, foreign
concepts were quickly removed from the books and records and, if
possible, from the history of the world, which is a world dominated by
the West. As the philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel once
remarked, the East plays no part in the formation of the history of
thought.
But let us step back a bit. Remember what school told us
about the humanities? They are not the sciences! If the humanities were
science, the vocabularies of the world's languages would add up, not
overlap. Does that surprise you?
I estimate that there are over
35,000 Chinese words or phrases that cannot properly be translated into
the English language. Words like yin and yang, kung fu and fengshui. Add
to this another 35,000 Sanskrit terminology, mainly from India and
Buddhism. Words like Buddha, bodhisattva and guru.
In a recent
lecture at Peking University, the renowned linguist Gu Zhengkun
explained that wenming describes a high level of ethics and gentleness
of a people, while the English word "civilization" derives from a city
people's mastery over materials and technology.
The correct
Chinese translation of civilization should be chengshijishu-zhuyi.
Wenming is better, but untranslatable. It has been around for some
thousand years, too, while Europe's notion of "civilization" is a late
18th-century "invention."
Tourists and imperialists do not come
to be taught. They call things the way they call things at home. Then
they realize that the names are not correct.
Science-fiction fantasy is becoming mundane reality and video games
are increasingly merging with 21st century combat. The DoD recruits
youth through traveling arcade exhibitions and new recruits are just as
likely to end up behind a keyboard as behind enemy lines. What does this
mean for the future of our predictively programmed world, and should we
be worried. Find out more in this week’s edition of The Corbett Report.
Local media mogul gives 2 hour talk exposing CFR, NED, and global-corporate meddling in Thailand.
Media mogul Sondhi Limthongkul of ASTV, a popular news and media outlet in Thailand, gave a 2-hour talk on Friday night
(in Thai) regarding the corporate-funded Council on Foreign Relations
(CFR), the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), USAID, Human Rights
Watch (HRW), and Amnesty International amongst others and their role in
destabilizing nation states around the world and in particular their
unfolding plot in Thailand itself.
Image: Sondhi Limthongkul - media mogul turned infowarrior - goes from rallying crowds to informing them. Malaysia has used this tactic to great effect against globalist meddling in their sovereign affairs - one can only hope Thailand is starting down a similar path.
No punches were pulled, and the talk was accompanied by a news story on the ASTV website, Manager.co.th
(in Thai), complete with graphics illustrating the documented ties
between foreign corporate-financier interests and seditious elements
within Thailand working with them.
Image:
From Manager.co.th illustrating the globalist tentacles reaching into
Thailand and their willful Thai helpers. (click image to enlarge)
Sondhi's narrative encapsulates the underlying cause of over 6 years of
political instability plaguing Thailand and focuses on Wall Street and
London's proxy of choice, Thaksin Shinawatra.
The Pentagon is now pushing to send a massive floating base which
will serve as a staging point for commando squads in the Middle East, a
move which I think can be easily traced back to the constantly rising
tensions with Iran over the Strait of Hormuz and their alleged nuclear
weapons program.
Of course, they only say that this is part of the reason, just like
they claim that the massively increased American presence in the region
is nothing to be concerned about while obviously it is.
The other threats they claim justify this move are al Qaeda in Yemen, Somali pirates, and more.
This move is supposedly being made at the behest of United States
Central Command (CENTCOM) which is at the helm of all of the military
operations going on throughout the Middle East.
The Navy will be converting an old warship which was going to be
decommissioned into a floating staging base for commando operations.
This makes me wonder, why the emphasis on the fact that it is an
aging vessel that was going to be decommissioned? Could this perhaps be a
set up for a false flag to be blamed on Iran? The possibility is there
and should be considered.
The makeshift base has been unofficially dubbed a “mothership” and is
capable of launching smaller high-speed boats and the types of
helicopters which are typically utilized by the Navy SEALs according to
procurement documents brought to my attention by The Washington Post.
This new move is being chalked up to the shift in military focus
under the Obama administration’s “new” strategy – which many have
rightly pointed out is not actually that new and in fact contains some major contradictions
– to a heavier reliance on Special Forces operations in order to make
the American military “leaner and more agile” in the face of at least
$487 billion in spending cuts at the Pentagon over the next ten years.
I think that this latest deployment should be emphasized because the
military refuses to discuss where exactly this new “mothership” will be
deployed in the Middle East.
"This thing turned up. My first reaction was to tell the guys that we
have a UFO here on the bottom," said Peter Lindberg, the leader of the
amateur treasure hunters.
Sonar readings show that the mysterious object is about 60 meters
across, or, about the size of a jumbo jet. And it's not alone. Nearby on
the sea floor is another, smaller object with a similar shape. Even
more fascinating, both objects have "drag marks" behind them on the sea
floor, stretching back more than 400 feet.
"Could this be the Star Wars Millenium Falcon, a plug to an inner
world or a marine version of Stonehenge?" asks CNN's Brooke Bowman:
Well, it could just be another shipwreck. Or, mud.
But Lindberg says the ship theory doesn't really hold up because of
the unusually large size of the objects. "Of course it would be
something from another ship but it's quite big," he told CNN. Lindberg
notes that some observers have speculated that the objects may be
Russian warships built around the end of the 1800's. However, Lindberg
points out that not only were those ships much smaller, they were not
patrolling the Baltic during that era.
In search of solutions to our economic woes, tonight we dip into the
corbettreport.com archives for past interviews, episodes and videos of
The Corbett Report featuring ideas for getting out of this economic
mess. From the Cook plan to public banking, the gold standard and the
demystification of sound/fiat money, tonight’s broadcast looks at
competing answers to our money problems.
In the Soviet Union common criminals were punished less harshly and
received better treatment than political prisoners. A person who had
committed a violent crime had more rights than someone who expressed
criticism of the government and could be portrayed as having acted
against the government. We now have the same situation in the US.
In a recent case the Supreme Court overturned the sentence of a drug
dealer who was convicted on the basis of a warrantless 28-day search by
having a GPS device affixed to his car. In other words, a common
criminal still has privacy rights under the Constitution, but not US
citizens who are suspected of vague and nebulous “terrorist support.”
Both Republicans and Democrats have demonstrated disregard for the civil
liberty protections guaranteed by the US Constitution. Among the
visible candidates for president, only Ron Paul has respect for the
Constitution. As it is now possible for the executive branch to take
away the life and liberty of a US citizen without due process of law,
the Constitution is for all practical purposes lost. Tyranny looms, and
Ron Paul is the only candidate who stands against tyranny.
This is why I have written that Ron Paul is our last chance and
encouraged his libertarian handlers to be flexible enough for the
electorate to elect Ron Paul. I agree that Ron Paul, if elected
president, would be hamstrung by the Establishment, but the other
candidates offer no hope whatsoever.
What is at stake is not libertarianism, but the US Constitution.
Unfortunately, not many libertarians see that. Neither do many
progressives. If truth be known, Americans are too divided and in
opposition to one another to be able to unite against tyranny.
Education in America desperately needs funding, and Obama, despite his words, will not solve the problem.
In a
speech at Ann Arbor, Michigan, Obama proposed to increase the Perkins
loan program from $1 billion to $8 billion, create a $1 billion grant
competition, and a $55 million competition. Obama promised to make the
pricing of school more transparent and to cap student loan payments at
10% of a student's monthly income after graduation.
In
theory, these things sound good and Obama was understandably met with
large rounds of applause. In reality though, they will create more
problems than they will do good.
The most
significant promise is the $7 billion dollars in more student loans.
America is in the biggest credit bubble since the Roaring 20s, leading
to this most inequality in decades, and more loans are not going to help
the problem, regardless of the seemingly favorable terms.
The $1
billion dollars in grants, assuming there are 17.5 million students
enrolled in post-secondary education in the US, equals $57.14 per
post-secondary student. Let's take a low estimate that the average
yearly tuition at an American college is $10,000 (many colleges charge
much more), then Obama's grant promises to cover 0.57% of the cost of
one year of American college. In this context, the $55 million
competition is not even worth mentioning. Funding in the form a
competition is a very obvious example of promoting the needs of a few
over the needs of many.
The
grant funding is a token to please ignorant voters, while avoiding
making the needed ethical commitment to deal with one of America's most
pressing problems.
In last night's Republican "debate", establishment candidates Romney and Gingrich vent
disinformation to demean the people of Palestine as they vie for Israeli
lobby favoritism.
The Atlanta Jewish Times has published an op-ed suggesting that
Netanyahu might have to order the Mossad to kill an “unfriendly” US
President…so where’s the outcry? Find out on this episode of Corbett
Report Radio as we run down the headlines and traverse the Food World
Order with James Evan Pilato.
James Corbett is an independent journalist and a true champion of
alternative media. He has informed and influenced millions of people
through his youtube channel and website. In this interview we discuss
how James got started and how his hard work and dedication has brought
him to the point of doing this work full time. James also gives us his
insight on the recent situation involving the PIPA and SOPA bills and
the reaction by Anonymous. Considering James was my first subscriber at
Press For Truth TV I thought it would be fitting for him to be my first
guest.
This is interesting. Kader Arif, the "rapporteur" for ACTA, has quit that role in disgust over the process behind getting the EU to sign onto ACTA. A rapporteur
is a person "appointed by a deliberative body to investigate an issue."
However, it appears his investigation of ACTA didn't make him very
pleased:
I want to denounce in the strongest possible manner the entire process
that led to the signature of this agreement: no inclusion of civil
society organisations, a lack of transparency from the start of the
negotiations, repeated postponing of the signature of the text without
an explanation being ever given, exclusion of the EU Parliament's
demands that were expressed on several occasions in our assembly.
As rapporteur of this text, I have faced never-before-seen manoeuvres
from the right wing of this Parliament to impose a rushed calendar
before public opinion could be alerted, thus depriving the Parliament of
its right to expression and of the tools at its disposal to convey
citizens' legitimate demands.”
Everyone knows the ACTA agreement is problematic, whether it is its
impact on civil liberties, the way it makes Internet access providers
liable, its consequences on generic drugs manufacturing, or how little
protection it gives to our geographical indications.
This agreement might have major consequences on citizens' lives, and
still, everything is being done to prevent the European Parliament from
having its say in this matter. That is why today, as I release this
report for which I was in charge, I want to send a strong signal and
alert the public opinion about this unacceptable situation. I will not
take part in this masquerade.
Pretty rare to find such direct honesty in political circles. That's
quite a direct and clear condemnation of the entire process. In terms
of process, it will be interesting to see if this has an impact. While
the EU did sign on to ACTA today, it still needs to be ratified
by the European Parliament (more on that in a little while). Having
Arif quit makes a pretty big statement, and hopefully makes it easier
for Parliament Members to speak out loudly against ACTA... Still, this
is an uphill battle. The supporters of ACTA have been working to get
ACTA approved for years. To them, this is basically a done deal.
Indeed, instead of doing much to try to protect their citizens from Fukushima, Japan, the U.S. and the EU all just raised the radiation levels they deem “safe”.
Nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen says
that high-level friends in the State Department told him that Hillary
Clinton signed a pact with her counterpart in Japan agreeing that the
U.S. will continue buying seafood from Japan, despite that food not being tested for radioactive materials.
Nigeria,
Africa’s most populous nation and its largest oil producer, is from all
evidence being systematically thrown into chaos and a state of civil
war. The recent surprise decision by the government of Goodluck Jonathan
to abruptly lift subsidies on imported gasoline and other fuel has a
far more sinister background than mere corruption and the
Washington-based International Monetary Fund (IMF) is playing a key
role. China appears to be the likely loser along with Nigeria’s
population.
The recent strikes protesting the government’s abrupt elimination of
gasoline and other fuel subsidies, that brought Nigeria briefly to a
standstill, came as a surprise to most in the country. Months earlier
President Jonathan had promised the major trade union organizations that
he would conduct a gradual four-stage lifting of the subsidy to ease
the economic burden. Instead, without warning he announced an immediate
full removal of subsidies effective January 1, 2012. It was “shock
therapy” to put it mildly.
Nigeria today is one of the world’s most important producers of
light, sweet crude oil—the same high quality crude oil that Libya and
the British North Sea produce. The country is showing every indication
of spiraling downward into deep disorder. Nigeria is the fifth largest
supplier of oil to the United States and twelfth largest oil producer in
the world on a par with Kuwait and just behind Venezuela with
production exceeding two million barrels a day. [1]
The curious timing of IMF subsidy demand
Despite
its oil riches, Nigeria remains one of Africa’s poorest countries. The
known oilfields are concentrated around the vast Niger Delta roughly
between Port Harcourt and extending in the direction of the capital
Lagos, with large new finds being developed all along the oil-rich Gulf
of Guinea. Nigeria’s oil is exploited and largely exported by the
Anglo-American giants—Shell, Mobil, Chevron, Texaco. Italy’s Agip also
has a presence and most recently, to no one’s surprise, the Chinese
state oil companies began seeking major exploration and oil
infrastructure agreements with the Lagos government.
Ironically, despite the fact that Nigeria has abundant oil to earn
dollar export revenue to build its domestic infrastructure, government
policy has deliberately let its domestic oil refining capacity fall into
ruin. The consequence has been that most of the gasoline and other
refined petroleum products used to drive transportation and industry,
has to be imported, despite the country’s abundant oil. In order to
shield the population from the high import costs of gasoline and other
refined fuels, the central government has subsidized prices.
How would you react if I were to tell you that you or your child were forced to participate in experimental vaccine trials?
A paper published by the American Medical Association’s Virtual Mentor wants to do just that.
It seems that the amount of current participants in current
experimental vaccine trials is a bit too low, so why not create a
federal law forcing each person to need to “opt-out” of experimental
vaccine trials in an attempt to better society?
AMA Proposes Law ‘Forcing’ Individuals to Participate in Experimental Vaccine Trials
The proposed law is lunacy, to say the least, stating that individuals
must make a “mandated choice” to participate in such experimental
trials. People shouldn’t be automatically enrolled in experimental
trials or need to state in advance their decision to “opt-out”.
Along with the law will come a customer list for big pharma, where each participant’s information will be shared with the pharmaceutical companies in order to gather trial and field test data.
Of course this isn’t so different from how things operate now, where
individuals are enrolled into big pharma’s database even if you exempt
your child from vaccination. But if big pharma can’t produce enough
positive data from those who actually want to volunteer for introducing a new product to the FDA for approval, they may just try to force people to participate or use a segment of the population that is ignorant to the laws surrounding the trials.
What happens if these experimental vaccines cause harm?
There are laws already set in place that essentially give vaccine manufacturers immunity to legal repercussions.
That is to say that if your child is harmed from a vaccine, the
vaccine manufacturers are not financially or morally responsible. The
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 protects vaccine
manufacturers from any liability.