Wednesday, November 23, 2011
BBC's Greg Palast: The Global Corporate Dictatorship
Source: Infowars
Alex talks with New York Times-bestselling author and a freelance
journalist for the BBC, Greg Palast. Greg talks about the MF Global
heist and the money filched from segregated client accounts, now
totaling more than $1.2 billion. Palast is the author of Vultures'
Picnic and The Best Democracy Money Can Buy. He has also appeared in a
number of films, including American Blackout and Bush Family Fortunes.
Labels:
Alex Jones,
Banksters,
Central Banks,
Economic Crisis,
Goldman Sachs,
Greg Palast,
Infowars,
MF Global,
Video
Bush and Blair Found Guilty of War Crimes
Source: Press TV
The five-panel Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal decided that Bush and Blair committed genocide and crimes against humanity by leading the invasion of Iraq in 2003, a Press TV correspondent reported on Tuesday.
In 2003, the US and Britain invaded Iraq in blatant violation of international law and under the pretext of finding weapons of mass destruction allegedly stockpiled by former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.
The Malaysian tribunal judges ruled that the decision to wage war against Iraq by the two former heads of government was a flagrant abuse of law and an act of aggression that led to large-scale massacres of the Iraqi people.
Bombings and other forms of violence became commonplace in Iraq shortly after the US-led invasion of the country.
In their ruling, the tribunal judges also stated that the US, under the leadership of Bush, fabricated documents to make it appear that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.
However, the world later learned that the former Iraqi regime did not possess WMDs and that the US and British leaders knew this all along.
Over one million Iraqis were killed during the invasion, according to the California-based investigative organization Project Censored.
The judges also said the court findings should be provided to signatories to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, and added that the names of Bush and Blair should be listed on a war crimes register.
A War Crimes Tribunal
in Malaysia has found former US President George W. Bush and former
British Prime Minister Tony Blair guilty of war crimes for their roles
in the Iraq war, Press TV reports.
The five-panel Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal decided that Bush and Blair committed genocide and crimes against humanity by leading the invasion of Iraq in 2003, a Press TV correspondent reported on Tuesday.
In 2003, the US and Britain invaded Iraq in blatant violation of international law and under the pretext of finding weapons of mass destruction allegedly stockpiled by former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.
The Malaysian tribunal judges ruled that the decision to wage war against Iraq by the two former heads of government was a flagrant abuse of law and an act of aggression that led to large-scale massacres of the Iraqi people.
Bombings and other forms of violence became commonplace in Iraq shortly after the US-led invasion of the country.
In their ruling, the tribunal judges also stated that the US, under the leadership of Bush, fabricated documents to make it appear that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.
However, the world later learned that the former Iraqi regime did not possess WMDs and that the US and British leaders knew this all along.
Over one million Iraqis were killed during the invasion, according to the California-based investigative organization Project Censored.
The judges also said the court findings should be provided to signatories to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, and added that the names of Bush and Blair should be listed on a war crimes register.
The Media and Iran: Familiar Mindlessness

Glenn Greenwald
The lesson supposedly learned by the U.S. establishment media from the
Iraq debacle was the danger of relying on anonymous government sources
to disseminate unverified fear-mongering accusations. Rather obviously,
no such lesson has been learned, as this continues to be the primary
reporting method for accusing the Supreme Hitlers of the Moment — Iran —
of anything and everything the U.S. Government can dream up. The latest
entry, and one of the most egregious yet, is this Washington Post screed appearing under this headline and hovering scary picture:
Here’s the crux of the story, by R. Jeffrey Smith, Joby Warrick and Colum Lynch:
The Obama administration is investigating whether Iran supplied the Libyan government of Moammar Gaddafi with hundreds of special artillery shells for chemical weapons that Libya kept secret for decades, U.S. officials said. . . .The discovery of the shells has prompted a probe, led by U.S. intelligence, into how the Libyans obtained them; several sources said early suspicion had fallen on Iran. “We are pretty sure we know” the shells were custom-designed and produced in Iran for Libya, said a senior U.S. official, one of several who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the accusation.
So it isn’t merely that the prior Hitler of the Moment — Moammar Gadaffi — had Weapons of Mass Destruction,
but far more alarming: Iran likely manufactured and gave Gadaffi those
WMDs! Is there no Evil behind which these Persian Monsters are not
lurking? Here are all of the sources the Post reporters cite for this claim:
U.S. officials said . . . several sources . . . A U.S. official with access to classified information . . . a third U.S. official said. . . .One U.S. official said . . . .another U.S. official said.
The Post‘s own Ombudsman has repeatedly bashed the paper for its excessive, ill-explained, reckless use of anonymous sources (which violates even the Post‘s own non-public anonymity rules),
and has insisted that the paper’s “credibility” — to the extent such a
thing can be said to exist — is being steadily eroded by this practice.
Here, the Post screeches a sensationalized, highly
consequential story (it even proudly notes these disclosures “may
exacerbate international tensions over the country’s alleged pursuit of
weapons of mass destruction”) based exclusively on
anonymous U.S. official sources, and barely pretends to explain why
anonymity is justified (that the accusations are “sensitive” is an added
reason to ensure accountability, not protect the government accusers
with anonymity).
Why does the U.S. want a total media blackout on long-term Afghan deal?

Madison Ruppert
During a press conference yesterday, Safia Sediqi, loya jirga (which in the Pashto language means “grand council”) spokeswoman, said that Washington wants a complete media blackout over the conditions set forth in the new strategic long-term deal with Afghanistan, according to Press TV and BBC Persian.
Called by Afghan President Hamid Karzai, the loya jirga began in the
Afghan capital of Kabul on Wednesday and will run for four days.
The discussion will focus on the Afghan-American relationship,
specifically the possibility of long-term American basis on Afghan soil after the U.S.-led coalition forces are supposedly going to withdraw in 2014.
Both political and religious figures in Afghanistan have been vocal
in their opposition to American plans for long-lasting or very possibly
permanent military bases on sovereign Afghan territory.
As I previously reported, the people of Afghanistan are increasingly seeing the foreign troops as occupying forces
that are not protecting their security, which is reflected in the utter
failure that the decade-long battle in Afghanistan has been.
As Press TV
points out, the U.S. has not met its goals after 10 years and the
security situation is abysmal despite nearly 150,000 U.S.-led foreign
troops deployed around the nation.
The state-funded BBC Persian news network reports that the most
common complaint amongst loya jirga participants is that they have not
been provided with information about the terms and conditions of the
long-term deal.
Sharifullah Sahak, an Afghan employee of The New York Times covering Kabul and provinces said via Twitter just four hours ago at the time of writing, “Loya Jirga members with different views saying government should sign the strategic pact for 10, 20, even for 50 years with US.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)