Source:
Consortium News
Lawrence Davidson
Over the past few decades in America, reality has
been put in play as never before, with powerful interests
using sophisticated “perception management,” the shaping of how the
public perceives the outside world, a threat that Lawrence Davidson says
is again leading the nation to destruction.
In mid-February, an array of top U.S.
intelligence chiefs appeared before
the Senate Intelligence Committee to give their annual report on
“current and future worldwide threats” to national security. Those
testifying included CIA Director David Petraeus, National Intelligence
Director James Clapper, Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lt. General
Ronald Burgess, and FBI Director Robert Mueller.
Their presentations on what is and is not a real
threat to the nation, as well as the reaction of the senators holding
the hearings, turned out to be an exercise in one dimensional thinking.
What is real? Well, what comports with your point of view. Here are two
examples from their testimony:
1. The Enemy Within – Rogue individuals
operating “within the ranks” of the intelligence community and armed
forces now constitute a major threat to U.S. security. According to Lt.
General Burgess these people are “
self-radicalized lone wolves.” He pointed to the “recent massive WikiLeaks disclosures.”
Everyone involved in these hearings agreed with this assertion even though it is based on a dubious,
yet unquestioned, assumption – that the behavior of U.S. government
forces is a model of acceptable normal military and intelligence
behavior. Those who work for the government but find this behavior
unacceptable, and indeed a criminal betrayal of all that is humane, and
then do something about that conviction are “self-radicalized” dangers
to national security.
Image: Director of National Intelligence James Clapper talks with President
Barack Obama in the Oval Office. (Photo credit: Office of Director of
National Intelligence)
But what if the support of oppressive and racist
regimes, the invasion of other countries based on lies, the killing of
thousands upon thousands of civilians, and the official use of torture
and “extraordinary rendition” constitute radical and unreasonable
behavior? Then those who expose such extremism would not be the radicals
at all. They would be champions of a more reasonable norm and also
heroes.
My suggestion is that this is exactly the case. The
country’s pursuit of its alleged national interests is being directed by
a bunch of thugs in suits who have taken it upon themselves to label as
“radicals” those citizen heroes who point out this fact. They are
afraid that more and more citizens might see the real barbaric nature of
their policies and call them to account. So, to prevent this, they
criminalize (and demonize) the truth-tellers.