Saturday, December 3, 2011
Study Proves Fluoride Brain Damage

Kurt Nimmo
A study conducted by scientists in India demonstrates that consumption
of sodium fluoride results in brain and neurological damage. It was
published by K. Pratap Reddy of the University College of Sciences at
Osmania University in Hyderabad, India, on January 10, 2011.
The study was performed on rats for a period of 60 days. Fluoride
resulted in neurodegenerative changes and morphological alterations were
observed in the neocortex, hippocampus and cerebellum areas of the
brain and also the spinal cord and sciatic nerve.
In 1995, Dr. Phyllis Mullenix
and her colleagues found that fluoride studies in rats “can be
indicative of a potential for motor dysfunction, IQ deficits and/or
learning disabilities in humans.”
“High levels of fluoride in drinking water (1-12ppm) affect central
nervous system directly without first causing the physical deformities
of skeletal fluorosis.” Reddy writes in the Journal of Medical and
Allied Sciences. Damage to the hippocampus often results in
hyperactivity and cognitive deficits.
Numerous studies conducted in China, India, Iran, and Mexico have determined that fluoride exposure is associated with IQ deficits in children.
The correlation between fluoride exposure and diminished IQ was
underscored earlier this year after the results of a study in China were
published. “A recent Chinese study concluded that low dose sodium
fluoride in drinking water diminishes IQ, especially among children.
This is the twenty-fourth such international study with the same
conclusion. Sodium fluoride has also been linked to reduced fertility
and lower sperm counts,” Paul Fassa wrote for Natural News in April.
In addition to the Chinese study, and 23 other IQ studies, there have
been over 100 animal studies linking fluoride to brain damage,
according to the Fluoride Action Network. The Indian study is the most
recent.
The Chinese study “should be the study that finally ends water
fluoridation. Millions of American children are being exposed
unnecessarily to this neurotoxin on a daily basis. Who in their right
minds would risk lowering their child’s intelligence in order to reduce a
small amount of tooth decay, for which the evidence is very weak,”
explains Tara Blank, Ph.D., the Science and Health Officer for the Fluoride Action Network.
The Indian study is available as a PDF here.
It is an invaluable asset for activists attempting to get rid of the
deadly neurotoxin sodium fluoride from our drinking water and food
products.
The Entire United States is Now a War Zone: S.1867 Passes The Senate With Massive Support

Madison Ruppert
This is one of the most tragic events I have written about since establishing End the Lie
over eight months ago: the horrendous bill that would turn all of
America into a battlefield and subject American citizens to indefinite
military detention without charge or trial has passed the Senate.
To make matters even worse, only seven of our so-called representatives voted against the bill, proving once and for all (if anyone had any doubt remaining) that our government does not work for us in any way, shape, or form.
S.1867, or the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the fiscal year of 2012, passed with a resounding 93-7 vote.
That’s right, 93 of our Senators voted to literally eviscerate what little rights were still protected after the PATRIOT Act was hastily pushed in the wake of the tragic events of September 11th, 2001.
The NDAA cuts Pentagon spending by $43 billion from last year’s budget, a number so insignificant when compared to the $662 billion still (officially) allocated, it is almost laughable.
The bill also contained an amendment which enacts strict new sanctions on Iran’s Central Bank and any entities that do business with it, a move which will likely have brutal repercussions for the Iranian people – just like the sanctions on Iraq did.
To make matters even worse, only seven of our so-called representatives voted against the bill, proving once and for all (if anyone had any doubt remaining) that our government does not work for us in any way, shape, or form.
S.1867, or the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the fiscal year of 2012, passed with a resounding 93-7 vote.
That’s right, 93 of our Senators voted to literally eviscerate what little rights were still protected after the PATRIOT Act was hastily pushed in the wake of the tragic events of September 11th, 2001.
The NDAA cuts Pentagon spending by $43 billion from last year’s budget, a number so insignificant when compared to the $662 billion still (officially) allocated, it is almost laughable.
The bill also contained an amendment which enacts strict new sanctions on Iran’s Central Bank and any entities that do business with it, a move which will likely have brutal repercussions for the Iranian people – just like the sanctions on Iraq did.
Not a single Senator voted against this amendment, which was voted on
soon before the entirety of S.1867 was passed, despite the hollow
threats of a veto from the Obama White House.
Based simply on historical precedent, I trust Obama’s promises as much as I trust the homeless man who told me he was John F. Kennedy.
I wish that I could believe that the Obama administration would strike down this horrific bill but I would be quite ignorant and naïve if I did so.
Furthermore, the White House’s official statement doesn’t even say that they will veto the bill. In fact, it says, “the President’s senior advisers [will] recommend a veto.”
As Glenn Greenwald points out, the objection isn’t even about opposing the detention of accused terrorists without a trial, instead it is the contention that, “whether an accused Terrorist is put in military detention rather than civilian custody is for the President alone to decide.”
Obama’s opposition has nothing to do with the rule of law or protecting Americans, in fact, Senator Levin disclosed and Dave Kopel reported that, “it was the Obama administration which told Congress to remove the language in the original bill which exempted American citizens and lawful residents from the detention power”.
Based simply on historical precedent, I trust Obama’s promises as much as I trust the homeless man who told me he was John F. Kennedy.
I wish that I could believe that the Obama administration would strike down this horrific bill but I would be quite ignorant and naïve if I did so.
Furthermore, the White House’s official statement doesn’t even say that they will veto the bill. In fact, it says, “the President’s senior advisers [will] recommend a veto.”
As Glenn Greenwald points out, the objection isn’t even about opposing the detention of accused terrorists without a trial, instead it is the contention that, “whether an accused Terrorist is put in military detention rather than civilian custody is for the President alone to decide.”
Obama’s opposition has nothing to do with the rule of law or protecting Americans, in fact, Senator Levin disclosed and Dave Kopel reported that, “it was the Obama administration which told Congress to remove the language in the original bill which exempted American citizens and lawful residents from the detention power”.
Russia Delivers Missiles to Syria, Says Report

Russia has delivered supersonic cruise missiles to Syria despite the
violence shaking the Arab country and Israel's furious condemnation of
the deal, a news report said on Thursday.
"The Yakhont supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles have been delivered
to Syria," a military source told the Interfax news agency without
disclosing when the shipment was made.
Russia signed a contract reportedly worth at least $300 million (222
million euros) in 2007 to supply its traditional Arab world ally with a
large shipment of the cruise missiles.
Reports said Russia intended to deliver 72 of the missiles to Syria in all.
The deal immediately angered Israel, which fears the weapons may fall
into the hands of Hezbollah militants in neighboring Lebanon.
Russia has since also come under growing pressure from Washington,
which wants all military sales to President Bashar al-Assad's regime
halted because of his deadly crackdown on Syrian street protests.
But Moscow has defended Assad against global pressure and this week
argued that its arms sales were permitted under international law and
would continue.
Another Russian official told Interfax that the missiles, which
operate as part of the Bastion mobile coastal defense system, "will be
able to protect Syria's entire coast against a possible attack from the
sea."
Each Bastion system is equipped with 36 cruise missiles as well as truck-mounted radar and other equipment.
It was not immediately clear how many of the missiles Russia has delivered to Syria so far.
East Jerusalem Palestinians Being Evicted From Their Homes

Catrina Stewart
A 60-year-old law is being used to evict
Palestinian families and expand Jewish settlements in the coveted
suburbs of East Jerusalem
At the top of a steep and ramshackle street in the Palestinian
neighbourhood of Silwan, a rusty, battered gate opens into an
unremarkable house. Less than a quarter mile away, though, stand the Al
Aqsa mosque and the Wailing Wall, two of Jerusalem's most venerated holy
sites, making it a very attractive piece of real estate indeed.
For Mohammed Sumarin, 52, whose late uncle owned this house, this is
home. He was born here, raised here, and has never lived anywhere else.
But now he faces losing his home of more than half a century to the
Jewish National Fund (JNF), an Israeli charity that claims the house for
its own and is battling to evict the family.
Silwan, sprawled
along the southern flank of Jerusalem's Old City, is the politically
sensitive epicentre of the struggle for East Jerusalem, coveted by
Palestinians as the capital of their future state, and claimed by
Israel, which annexed the eastern sector after the 1967 Six Day War, as
an integral part of an undivided Jerusalem.
The evictions and
demolitions of Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem are widely seen as
deliberately aiding Israeli settlers in staking the Jewish claim to the
eastern part of the city to thwart a final peace agreement that could
cleave the city in two.
For the past month, the Sumarins have been
living with the knowledge that they would have to leave their home by
the end of the month or face forcible eviction. "We are not living like
human beings," Mr Sumarin, a severe diabetic who is bedridden for much
of the day, says. "We cannot sleep at night. We live in fear. We expect
them to come at any moment and throw us out."
Waiting in the wings
is Himnuta, the shadowy arm of the JNF, which declares itself the owner
of the house. Himnuta, unlike the Fund, seeks to acquire property
across the Green Line. Israeli and Palestinian activists fear that if
Himnuta gets hold of the house, it will, as it has many times before,
lease the house to El'ad, an extreme religious settler group that has
established a bible-inspired archaeological park in the area and covets
this neighbourhood for the Jews.
Draconian EPA Regulations To Cause Rolling Blackouts

Paul Joseph Watson
The cost of complying with draconian new EPA rules on carbon
emissions will force coal plants in Texas to close and increase the
likelihood of rolling blackouts, as the Obama administration’s vow to
“bankrupt” the coal industry takes full effect.
When rolling blackouts hit Texas at the start of the year, we wrote a series of articles
pointing out that President Barack Obama’s promise to “bankrupt” the
coal industry, in the form of draconian EPA regulations that would cause
older power plants to close, had contributed to the power outages.
Several of these articles were picked up by the likes of the Drudge
Report and Fox News, stoking a wider controversy.
In response, the White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer claimed in a blog post that appeared on WhiteHouse.gov that the story came from a “questionable” source and was “unquestionably false.” We then issued a rebuttal documenting how the blackouts were caused by a maxed-out power grid and not by “mechanical failures” as Pfeiffer claimed in his article.
Ten months down the line and the Austin-American Statesman reports today
that, “Texas could face power shortages as soon as next year as aging
plants are mothballed in response to new environmental standards,
according to the state’s grid operator and the organization that
monitors the U.S. power grids for the federal government.”
In other words, ourselves and other critics who warned that the EPA’s
draconian eco-regulations would cause rolling blackouts, after being
attacked by the White House, have been proven completely accurate.
“Already Dallas-based Luminant Generation Co., Texas’ largest
electricity generator, has announced it intends to idle two coal-fired
generating units as part of a plan to comply with the rule,” reports the Houston Chronicle.
Inadequate supply of power is being greatly exacerbated by coal and
natural gas plants being shut down because they cannot afford the
crippling EPA regulation fees, which will lead to “power shortages as
soon as next year”.
“The report by the North American Electric Reliability Corp. found
that many older power plants in Texas will be retired rather than
retrofitted to meet new federal emission standards,” reports the
Statesman, closures that have been welcomed by the likes of the Clean
Energy Group consortium, whose agenda is to promote the vehemently
discredited pseudo-science of man-made global warming.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)