Saturday, January 14, 2012
A Tale of Two Candidates - Ron Paul and Mitt Romney
Source: David Terry
This video is not sponsored or endorsed by the Ron Paul campaign. It was made by two supporters who believe in the cause of liberty.
Visit the following sites to learn more about Ron Paul:
http://ronpaulflix.com
http://www.ronpaul2012.com
http://www.facebook.com/ronpaul
http://www.facebook.com/ronpaul12
http://www.ronpaul.com
http://www.dailypaul.com
http://www.blackthisout.com
This video is not sponsored or endorsed by the Ron Paul campaign. It was made by two supporters who believe in the cause of liberty.
Visit the following sites to learn more about Ron Paul:
http://ronpaulflix.com
http://www.ronpaul2012.com
http://www.facebook.com/ronpaul
http://www.facebook.com/ronpaul12
http://www.ronpaul.com
http://www.dailypaul.com
http://www.blackthisout.com
FAQ: Why Are Globalist Think-Tank Documents Public?
Source: Land Destroyer Report
Tony Cartalucci
Tony Cartalucci
Q. Why are such research documents - Which Path to Persia? or "String of Pearls"
- made public on the web? If these are in fact strategic and
provide a view into the world of powers that run the show on our
globe, why would they allow such "sensitive" information and "plans"
to be made public for everyone to read?


Image:
Despite producing the vast majority of rules, regulations, laws and
policies that dictate the destiny of Western civilization, as well as
drawing up plans for war, these corporate-funded, corporate-serving
think-tanks are little known amongst the general public. Despite
publishing much of their work on publicly accessible websites, most
people will never know about it, let alone take the time to read it.
....
A. You
can't keep global empire a secret - by necessity you need people to
believe in your cause - even if you dress it up and spin it as something
other than naked conquest. The global corporate-financier elite
manage access to information by marketing different levels of it to
different demographics. This has been done throughout all of history.
The reasoning done with the aristocracy to keep them in line was more
straight-forward and pragmatic than the absolute fantasies used to dupe
and manipulate the common man.
It works in layers - papers like "Which Path to Persia?" being toward the top are aimed at people who believe in global governance and globalization - professors, senior editors, CEOs etc. who falsely believe they have a stake in the process - and while it is made public, it is generally inaccessible to the average reader because of its use of academic English, length, and very high minimal requirements in understanding the history, strategy, geopolitics, and human nature necessary to understand the contents.
It works in layers - papers like "Which Path to Persia?" being toward the top are aimed at people who believe in global governance and globalization - professors, senior editors, CEOs etc. who falsely believe they have a stake in the process - and while it is made public, it is generally inaccessible to the average reader because of its use of academic English, length, and very high minimal requirements in understanding the history, strategy, geopolitics, and human nature necessary to understand the contents.
CNN Reporter Is Criticized For Ron Paul Hit Piece
Source: Infowars
In the video below, CNN’s Dana Bash is repeatedly criticized for her unfair coverage of Ron Paul.
On January 2, the corporate media correspondent said she was worried
about the possibility of Paul doing well in the New Hampshire primary.
Paul came in second behind Mitt Romney on January 10.
Near the end of the video, Bash says she has received a lot of
negative email about her biased interview on January 9 that was cut
short by Jesse Benton, Paul’s campaign spokesman.
Oddly, she compares the criticism of her coverage to the Arab-Israeli
conflict and says there is nobody in the media as fair as she is.
Bash apologists at TVNewser insist the comment made to her husband and CNN anchor John King was merely a “misplaced phrase.”
Pointing Out The Veil of Authority
Source: MikeHansonArchives
John Bush returns to speak before Austin City Council on January 12, 2012. He was banned from Speaking for one year in August 2011. Four months later he received a letter from
the city that said his ban had been lifted. Apparenty the city realized they violated his right
to petiton his government and lifted the ban.
the city that said his ban had been lifted. Apparenty the city realized they violated his right
to petiton his government and lifted the ban.
SOPA: What if Google, Facebook and Twitter Went Offline in Protest?

Graeme McMillan
Can you imagine a world without Google or Facebook? If plans to protest the potential passing of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)
come to fruition, you won’t need to; those sites, along with many other
well-known online destinations, will go temporarily offline as a taste
of what we could expect from a post-SOPA Internet.
Companies including Google, Facebook, Twitter, PayPal, Yahoo! and
Wikipedia are said to be discussing a coordinated blackout of services
to demonstrate the potential effect SOPA would have on the Internet,
something already being called a “nuclear option” of protesting. The
rumors surrounding the potential blackout were only strengthened by
Markham Erickson, executive director of trade association NetCoalition,
who told FoxNews that “a number of companies have had discussions about [blacking out services]” last week.
According to Erickson, the companies are well aware of how serious an act such a blackout would be:
This type of thing doesn’t happen because companies typically don’t want to put their users in that position. The difference is that these bills so fundamentally change the way the Internet works. People need to understand the effect this special-interest legislation will have on those who use the Internet.
The idea of an Internet blackout should seem familiar to anyone who’s
been paying attention to the debate so far. In addition to a blackout
already carried out by Mozilla, hacking group Anonymous proposed the same thing
a couple of weeks ago, suggesting that sites replace their front pages
with a statement protesting SOPA. That suggestion itself came a week
after Jimmy Wales had asked Wikipedia users about the possibility of blacking out that site in protest of the bill.
False Flag: Mossad Posed as US Spies To Recruit Terrorists to Fight Covert Iran War

Mark Perry
A series of CIA memos describes how Israeli Mossad agents posed as American spies to recruit members of the terrorist organization Jundallah to fight their covert war against Iran.
Buried
deep in the archives of America's intelligence services are
a series of memos, written during the last years of President George W.
Bush's administration, that describe how Israeli Mossad officers
recruited operatives belonging to the
terrorist group Jundallah by passing themselves off as American agents.
According
to two U.S. intelligence officials, the Israelis, flush with American
dollars
and toting U.S. passports, posed as CIA officers in recruiting Jundallah
operatives -- what is commonly referred to as a "false flag" operation.
The
memos, as described by the sources, one of whom has read them and another who
is intimately familiar with the case, investigated and debunked reports from
2007 and 2008 accusing the CIA, at the direction of the White House, of covertly
supporting Jundallah -- a Pakistan-based Sunni extremist organization.
Jundallah, according to the U.S. government and published reports, is responsible for assassinating
Iranian government officials and killing Iranian women and children.
But
while the memos show that the United States had barred even the most incidental
contact with Jundallah, according to both intelligence officers, the same was
not true for Israel's Mossad. The memos also
detail CIA field reports saying that Israel's recruiting activities occurred under
the nose of U.S. intelligence officers, most notably in London, the capital of
one of Israel's ostensible allies, where Mossad officers posing as CIA
operatives met with Jundallah officials.
The
officials did not know whether the Israeli program to recruit and use Jundallah
is ongoing. Nevertheless, they were stunned by the brazenness of the Mossad's
efforts.
"It's
amazing what the Israelis thought they could get away with," the intelligence
officer said. "Their recruitment activities were nearly in the open. They
apparently didn't give a damn what we thought."
Labels:
CIA,
False Flag,
Foreign Policy,
Iran,
Iranian scientist,
Israel,
Mark Perry,
Mossad,
US,
War
RON PAUL IS THE CHOICE OF THE TROOPS! (Veterans & Active Duty march on the White House)
Source: AdamKokesh
This speech was delivered at Jillian's Billiards in Manchester, NH at
the Boots to NH debate watching party on January 7th, 2012. Thanks to
Ian Cioffi and crew for making this possible!
Iran Has 'Proof' US Killed Scientist

Iranian state television said today Tehran had evidence Washington
was behind the latest assassination of one of its nuclear scientists.
In
the fifth attack of its kind in two years, a magnetic bomb was attached
to the door of 32-year-old Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan's car during the
Wednesday morning rush-hour in the capital. His driver was also killed.
The United States has denied involvement in the killing and condemned it. Israel has declined to comment.
"We
have reliable documents and evidence that this terrorist act was
planned, guided and supported by the CIA," the Iranian foreign ministry
said in a letter handed to the Swiss ambassador in Tehran, state TV
reported.
"The documents clearly show that this terrorist act was carried out with the direct involvement of CIA-linked agents."
The
Swiss Embassy has represented US interests in Iran since Tehran and
Washington cut diplomatic ties shortly after the 1979 Islamic
revolution.
State TV said a "letter of condemnation" had also been
sent to the British government, saying the killing of Iranian nuclear
scientists had "started exactly after the British official John Sawers
declared the beginning of intelligence operations against Iran".
In
2010, chief of the British Secret Intelligence Service Sawers said one
of the agency's roles was to investigate efforts by states to build
nuclear weapons in violation of their international legal obligations
and identify ways to slow down their access to vital materials and
technology.
Tehran has urged the UN Security Council and
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to condemn the latest killing, which
Tehran says is aimed at undermining its nuclear work, which the West and
Israel say is aimed at building bombs. Tehran says its nuclear
programme is purely civilian.
Tension has mounted between Iran and
the West as the United States and European Union prepare measures aimed
at imposing sanctions on the Iran's oil exports, its economic
lifeblood.
The United States and Israel have not ruled out military action if diplomacy fails to resolve the nuclear dispute.
Iran: The Next War on Washington's Agenda Politics

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Only the blind do not see that the US government is preparing to attack Iran. According to Professor Michel Chossudovsky, “Active war preparations directed against Iran (with the involvement of Israel and NATO) were initiated in May 2003.”
Washington has deployed missiles directed at Iran in its oil emirate
puppet states, Oman and the UAE, and little doubt in the other US puppet
states in the Middle East. Washington has beefed up Saudi Arabia’s jet
fighter force. Most recently, Washington has deployed 9,000 US troops to
Israel to participate in “war games” designed to test the US/Israeli
air defense system. As Iran represents no threat unless attacked,
Washington’s war preparations signal Washington’s intention to attack
Iran.
Another signal that Washington has a new war on its agenda is the
raised level of Washington’s rhetoric and demonization of Iran. Judging
by polls Washington’s propaganda that Iran is threatening the US by
developing a nuclear weapon has met with success. Half of the American
public support a military attack on Iran in order to prevent Iran from
acquiring nuclear capability. Those of us who are trying to awaken our
fellow citizens start from a deficit that the minds of half of the US
population are under Big Brother’s control.
As the International Atomic Energy Agency’s reports from its
inspectors on the ground in Iran have made clear for years, there is no
evidence that Iran has diverted any enriched uranium from its nuclear
energy program. The shrill hype coming from Washington and from the
neoconservative media is groundless. it is the same level of lie as
Washington’s claim that Saddam Hussein in Iraq had weapons of mass
destruction. Every US soldier who died in that war died in behalf of a
lie.
It could not be more obvious that Washington’s war preparations
against Iran have nothing to do with deterring Iran from a nuclear
weapon. So, what are the war preparations about?
In my judgment, the US government’s war preparations are driven by
three factors. One is the neoconservative ideology, adopted by the US
government, that calls for the US to use its superior military and
economic position to achieve world hegemony. This goal appeals to
American hubris and to the power and profit that it serves.
A second factor is Israel’s desire to eliminate all support for the
Palestinians and for Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. Israel’s goal is to
seize all of Palestine and the water resources of southern Lebanon.
Eliminating Iran removes all obstacles to Israel’s expansion.
A third factor is to deter or slow China’s rise as a military and
economic power by controlling China’s access to energy. It was China’s
oil investments in eastern Libya that led to the sudden move against
Libya by the US and its NATO puppets, and it is China’s oil investments
elsewhere in Africa that resulted in the Bush regime’s creation of the
United States Africa Command, designed to counter China’s economic
influence with US military influence. China has significant energy
investments in Iran, and a substantial percentage of China’s oil imports
are from Iran. Depriving China of independent access to oil is
Washington’s way of restraining and boxing in China.
What we are witnessing is a replay of Washington’s policy toward
Japan in the 1930s that provoked the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
Japan’s bank balances in the West were seized, and Japan’s access to oil
and raw materials was restricted. The purpose was to prevent or to slow
Japan’s rise. The result was war.
Labels:
China,
CIA,
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts,
Geopolitics,
Infowars,
Iran,
Israel,
Mainstream Media,
NATO,
Police State / Big Brother,
Propaganda,
Russia,
War
BREAKING: Any conflict on Iran is a direct threat to Russia’s security – Rogozin

US-NATO AMD Target Russia. Will Russia Intervene Militarily against the US in the Case of an Attack on Iran
Russia's Deputy Prime Minister Dmitri Rogozin (RIA Novosti / Yana Lapikova)
The escalating conflict around
Iran should be contained by common effort, otherwise the promising Arab
Spring will grow into a “scorching Arab Summer,” says Dmitry Rogozin,
Russia’s deputy prime minister and former envoy to NATO.
“Iran is our close neighbor,
just south of the Caucasus. Should anything happen to Iran, should Iran
get drawn into any political or military hardships, this will be a
direct threat to our national security,” stressed Rogozin.
Dmitry Rogozin, who served as
Russia’s special envoy to NATO in 2008-2011, was appointed deputy prime
minister by Vladimir Putin in December. On Friday he was bidding
farewell to his NATO colleagues in the alliance’s headquarters in
Brussels.
As for Syria, if NATO persists in
interfering in its affairs, a catastrophe will be hard to avoid, said
Rogozin, talking to journalists on the premises of the Russian mission
to the alliance.
“The example of Libya should have cooled everybody down in matters dealing with foreign civil wars,” he said, stressing that this is his personal point of view.
“Syria must be left alone and
the sides to the conflict must be assisted in breaking the stand-off
and starting negotiations. No one must interfere with Syria. This is
dangerous,” added Rogozin.
The West’s attempts to improve
democracy in the Middle East and North Africa have resulted in Islamists
coming to power. It is now up to the West to decide how comfortable
they feel with neighbors who determine their politics with Sharia law,
says Rogozin.
Controlled Right Wing Establishment Attacks Ron Paul on Foreign Policy and Islam
Source: The Intel Hub
The Intel Hub News Brief Podcast #3
The Intel Hub News Brief Podcast #3
Joe Joseph and Popeye of Federaljack.com dissect the attacks made on
Ron Paul in articles published on World Net Daily and other
“conservative” news outlets. These hit pieces compared an apparent
adviser of Paul’s to Rev. Wright and were literally taken out of the neo
con attack strategy playbook.
The attacks focused on the absurd idea that Ron Paul supports or is
at least soft on radical Islam which the authors claim is a very real
threat to America while ignoring the banking cartels, the Federal
Reserve, and the Zionists who are heavily involved in American Foreign
Policy.
They also focus on the claim(and fact) made by Paul and others that
radical Islam is a creation of horrible American and Israeli foreign
policy. This is documented FACT and in no way means Ron Paul supports
Sharia Law or anything of the sort.
Cannabis Treatment Threatens Deadly Painkiller Industry

Anthony Gucciardi
Pharmaceutical painkillers are now responsible for more deaths in the United States than heroin and cocaine combined.
These pharmaceuticals are responsible for more than 15,000 deaths conservatively in 2008 alone. With no sign of slowing down, the painkiller industry is becoming wildly popular among Americans — as a result, so is the high rate of painkiller abuse.
Classified as dangerous by the U.S. government, cannabis (even in THC-free form, or free of psychoactive effects) has been identified as a powerful pain reliever in more than 80 peer-reviewed studies.
You may be aware of the fact that marijuana is usually quite high in THC (delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol), which is the compound responsible for the psychoactive effect of cannabis.
In contrast, it is also low in CBD (cannabidiol) content. Both THC and CBD are known as cannabinoids, however, which interacts with your body in a very unique way.
In fact, cannabinoids are key when it comes to pain relief. While this information alone is enough to shatter the traditional beliefs on government marijuana regulation, the relationship between CBD and THC is even more revealing.
What you may not be familiar with is how CBD has been shown to block the effect of THC in the nervous system. This allows for marijuana to be used with little or no psychoactive effects. Hemp, on the other hand, is high in CBD and low in THC. This is due to the fact that it is bred to maximize its fiber, seeds, and oil. Of course these key properties are what it is most commonly used for.
These pharmaceuticals are responsible for more than 15,000 deaths conservatively in 2008 alone. With no sign of slowing down, the painkiller industry is becoming wildly popular among Americans — as a result, so is the high rate of painkiller abuse.
Classified as dangerous by the U.S. government, cannabis (even in THC-free form, or free of psychoactive effects) has been identified as a powerful pain reliever in more than 80 peer-reviewed studies.
You may be aware of the fact that marijuana is usually quite high in THC (delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol), which is the compound responsible for the psychoactive effect of cannabis.
In contrast, it is also low in CBD (cannabidiol) content. Both THC and CBD are known as cannabinoids, however, which interacts with your body in a very unique way.
In fact, cannabinoids are key when it comes to pain relief. While this information alone is enough to shatter the traditional beliefs on government marijuana regulation, the relationship between CBD and THC is even more revealing.
What you may not be familiar with is how CBD has been shown to block the effect of THC in the nervous system. This allows for marijuana to be used with little or no psychoactive effects. Hemp, on the other hand, is high in CBD and low in THC. This is due to the fact that it is bred to maximize its fiber, seeds, and oil. Of course these key properties are what it is most commonly used for.
Trials Indicate Cannabis as an Effective Treatment for Chronic Pain
In a 2011 study published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, researchers examined the effects of cannabinoids on chronic pain and proper sleep. What they found in their trials challenges federal government claims that cannabis has ‘no accepted medical use’. The researchers conducted 18 trials using cannabinoids in the treatment of chronic pain, and found that cannabinoids demonstrated a significant painkilling effect as well as noticeable improvements in sleep in 15 of trials. Compared, to placebo, the cannabinoids were extremely effective.
Most importantly, there were no adverse effects.
In a 2011 study published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, researchers examined the effects of cannabinoids on chronic pain and proper sleep. What they found in their trials challenges federal government claims that cannabis has ‘no accepted medical use’. The researchers conducted 18 trials using cannabinoids in the treatment of chronic pain, and found that cannabinoids demonstrated a significant painkilling effect as well as noticeable improvements in sleep in 15 of trials. Compared, to placebo, the cannabinoids were extremely effective.
Most importantly, there were no adverse effects.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)