Source: Prison Planet
Paul Joseph Watson
Paul Joseph Watson
Former fellow of George Soros’ Open Society and current Stanford
University scholar Evgeny Morozov has called on Google and other search
engines to become thought crime enforcers, by providing warnings about
websites that contain “conspiracy theories” such as the belief, held by
a majority of Americans, that global warming is not primarily
man-made.
Morozov, whose biography confirms him as a well-connected insider, decries in a Slate piece
how the Internet is a useful tool for “People who deny global warming”
as well as “the anti-vaccination movement,” calling on Google to
provide a “socially responsible curated treatment” that would
marginalize such beliefs by amending search results.
His solution is to, “Nudge search engines to take more
responsibility for their index and exercise a heavier curatorial control
in presenting search results for issues like “global warming” or
“vaccination.” Google already has a list of search queries that send
most traffic to sites that trade in pseudoscience and conspiracy
theories; why not treat them differently than normal queries? Thus,
whenever users are presented with search results that are likely to
send them to sites run by pseudoscientists or conspiracy theorists,
Google may simply display a huge red banner asking users to exercise
caution and check a previously generated list of authoritative resources
before making up their minds.”
Morozov describes the potential that such a move will be judged as
Google “shilling for Big Pharma or for Al Gore” as “a risk worth
taking”.
This represents a similar argument to Cass Sunstein’s “cognitive infiltration,” an effort by Obama’s information czar to slap government warnings on controversial websites (including those claiming that exposure to sunlight is healthy). In a widely derided white paper,
Sunstein called for political blogs to be forced to include pop ups
that show “a quick argument for a competing view”. He also demanded
that taxes be levied on dissenting opinions and even suggested that
outright bans on certain thoughts should be enforced.
Giving companies like Google, which has grown to virtually become the gatekeeper of the entire Internet itself and is already engaging in SOPA-like acts of censorship,
the power to denote which political and scientific positions are
acceptable and which are fringe “conspiracy theories” is an insult to
free thinking and smacks of Chinese-style thought control.