Source:
Global Research
Finian Cunningham
Like a schoolyard bully, President Barack Obama
is flexing American military muscle as he currently sweeps through the
Asia-Pacific region. The nominal impetus for the tour was the Asia
Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit held in Hawaii last week. But
rather than discussing “economics” (the E in APEC), the salient focus
for Obama and his entourage appears to be “war” – and in particular
laying down battle lines to China.
Testy relations with China is nothing new for
Washington given recent months of US haranguing over trade and finance,
but what Obama’s bombast signals is a sinister ramping up of the
militarist agenda towards Beijing.
As if bouncing underlings and lackeys into his gang,
the American president has moved on from Honolulu with stopovers in
Australia, Indonesia and elsewhere. Given the primary economic power of
China in the hemisphere, it might be thought appropriate for Obama to
make a cordial visit to Beijing to discuss partnerships and policies to
revive the global economy. But no. The omission of China on this major
US tour seems to be a deliberate snub to Beijing and a message to the
region: that China is to be isolated and ringfenced. This is the stuff
of warmongering writ large.
The blatant aggression is naturally smoothed over and
made palatable by the Western mainstream media. Reporting on Obama’s
unilateral belligerence at the APEC, the Washington Post bemoans: “Try
as he might to focus Asian and Pacific leaders on forging new economic
partnerships during a regional summit here, President Obama has spent
much of his time in private meetings with his counterparts discussing
another pressing concern: national security [that is, US military
power].”
The Financial Times reports breathlessly: “Barack
Obama will not set foot in China during his swing through the
Asia-Pacific region… yet the country’s rapid economic ascent and
military advances will provide the backdrop for almost everything he
does on the trip.”
Note the assertion that it is China’s “military
advances” that are prompting US concerns, not the more reasonable and
realistic observation that Washington is the one beating the war drums.
The FT goes on to say: “The Pentagon is quietly
working on a new strategy dubbed the AirSea Battle concept, which is
designed to find ways to counter Chinese military plans to deny access
to US forces in the seas surrounding China.”
In “seas surrounding China” it may be thought by some
as entirely acceptable for Beijing to “deny access to US forces”. But
not, it seems, for the scribes at the FT and other Western mainstream
media, who transform US offence/Chinese defence into Chinese offence/US
defence. One can only imagine how that same media would report it if
China announced that it was intending to patrol nuclear warships off
California.