 Source: Infowars
Source: InfowarsKurt Nimmo
On Monday, David Cameron
 went before an international cyberspace conference in London and said 
it was “essential to strike a balance between the needs of online 
security and the right to free expression.” 
“We cannot leave cyberspace open to the criminals and the terrorists 
that threaten our security and our prosperity but at the same time we 
cannot just go down the heavy-handed route,” he said. 
John Kampfner, the chief executive of the Index on Censorship, clarified Cameron’s comments: 
“It’s very easy to defend the case of black and white – human rights 
against dictatorships around the world. But as soon as our own 
Western-style stability of the state is called into question, well then 
freedom of expression is expendable. There should be one rule for all 
including Western governments.”
Cameron’s comments are viewed as a response to China and Russia. Both
 countries have pushed for tighter regulation of the internet through 
binding international treaties.
In the United States, the government has used a mostly phantom cyber 
threat to call for draconian legislation to control the internet. In 
January, Sens. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) renewed their call for an “internet kill switch” that would allow the president to shut down the internet in response to a national emergency. 
The effort came as the Egyptian government shut down the internet
 in response to demonstrations calling for the removal of president 
Hosni Mubarak. The move demonstrated that governments have the ability 
and technical capacity to shut down the internet in response to 
political crises. 
