Source: Trend News Agency
Accusing President Barack Obama of naivete on Iran, Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney promised Thursday that if elected president he would "prepare for war" with the Islamic republic, the AFP reported referring to the Wall Street Journal.
Accusing President Barack Obama of naivete on Iran, Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney promised Thursday that if elected president he would "prepare for war" with the Islamic republic, the AFP reported referring to the Wall Street Journal.
Romney
said he would back up US diplomacy "with a very real and very credible
military option," deploying carrier battle groups to the Gulf and
boosting military aid to Israel.
"These
actions will send an unequivocal signal to Iran that the United States,
acting in concert with allies, will never permit Iran to obtain nuclear
weapons," he wrote.
Romney, a
frontrunner in the race for the Republican presidential nomination,
keyed his column to a International Atomic Energy Agency report this
week citing "credible evidence" that Iran had worked on a nuclear
explosive device.
Iran
denies it is developing nuclear weapons and insists its nuclear program
is for generating electricity, but the report has prompted calls in the
West for tougher UN sanctions and demands by Israel for world to act to
prevent Tehran for getting nuclear weapons.
Romney said the United States "needs a very different policy."
"'Si vis
pacem, para bellum.' That is a Latin phrase, but the ayatollahs will
have no trouble understanding its meaning from a Romney administration:
If you want peace, prepare for war," he said.
He
stopped short of advocating military action against Iran, but attacked
the Obama administration's diplomatic and sanctions-oriented approach to
Tehran's nuclear program as "a case study in botched diplomacy."
"Whether
this approach was rooted in naivete or in realistic expectations, can be
debated. I believe it was the former," Romney wrote.
He
criticized the administration for failing to get Moscow's support for
tougher action against Tehran as the price for a "reset" in US-Russian
relations, and Obama's refusal to meddle during Iran's Green Revolution
of 2009.
"A proper
American policy might or might not have altered the outcome; we will
never know," he wrote. "But thanks to this shameful abdication of moral
authority, any hope of toppling a vicious regime was lost, perhaps for
generations."
With the
US military tied down in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Obama administration
has played down a US military option against Iran, opting instead for
diplomacy and sanctions.
Robert
Gates, Obama's Republican defense secretary until earlier this year,
warned repeatedly against the use of military force, arguing it would
only drive the Iranian program deeper underground.
"The reality is there is no military option that does anything more than buy time," Gates told CNN in 2009.