Source: Infowars
Paul Joseph Watson
Speaking with the Alex Jones Show today, Congressman Paul went on the offensive against the bill, which is set to be signed into law by President Obama later this week.
Paul Joseph Watson
Top tier presidential candidate Ron Paul has decried the ‘indefinite 
detention’ provision of the National Defense Authorization Act, warning 
that it represents an arrogant, bold and dangerous attempt to establish 
martial law in America.
Speaking with the Alex Jones Show today, Congressman Paul went on the offensive against the bill, which is set to be signed into law by President Obama later this week.
Section 1031 of the NDAA bill, which itself defines the 
entirety of the United States as a “battlefield,” allows American 
citizens to be snatched from the streets, carted off to a foreign 
detention camp and held indefinitely without trial. The bill states that
 “any person who has committed a belligerent act” faces indefinite 
detention, but no trial or evidence has to be presented, the White House
 merely needs to make the accusation.
Paul said he saw significance in “the announcement and 
the arrogance of it all,” making reference to the Obama administration’s
 claim that it can now assassinate American citizens anywhere in the 
world and noting that the passage of the NDAA bill is an effort to 
codify the policy into law.
“This is a giant step – this should be the biggest news 
going right now – literally legalizing martial law,” said Paul, noting 
that the subject did not come up at all in any of the Republican 
debates.
The Congressman also decried the “arrogance” of an 
attempt to push through via a voice vote an amendment that would have 
still authorized indefinite detention even if a detainee was found innocent after a trial. The amendment was narrowly defeated by his son, Senator Rand Paul.
“This is big,” emphasized Paul, adding “This step where 
they can literally arrest American citizens and put them away without 
trial….is arrogant and bold and dangerous.”
Despite speculation that the Obama administration would veto the bill, it emerged yesterday
 that it was the White House itself which worked to remove language from
 the bill that would have protected American citizens from indefinite 
detention under Section 1031.
The administration has been working with lawmakers to 
alter a separate provision, Section 1032, which pertains to the military
 being required to take custody of individuals.
With the administration’s concerns over Section 1032 now
 largely resolved, a revised and final version of the bill could be 
signed into law before the end of the week.
“The conferees said they plan to bring the bill to the 
House floor for a vote as soon as Wednesday afternoon and to the Senate 
soon thereafter,” reports Politico.
Despite the revisions, the bill still contains language 
that allows Americans to be detained without trial at a detention center
 anywhere in the world.
Republican Congressman Justin Amash has again warned 
that lawmakers are attempting to mislead the American people by claiming
 U.S. citizens are exempt from the most dangerous provisions of the 
bill.
“Pres. Obama and many Members of Congress believe the 
President ALREADY has the authority the bill grants him. Legally, of 
course, he does not. This language was inserted to keep proponents and 
opponents of the bill appeased, while permitting the President to assert
 that the improper power he has claimed all along is now in statute,” writes Amash.
“They will say that American citizens are specifically 
exempted under the following language in Sec. 1032: “The requirement to 
detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend 
to citizens of the United States. Don’t be fooled. All this says is that
 the President is not REQUIRED to indefinitely detain American citizens 
without charge or trial. It still PERMITS him to do so,” warns the 
Congressman.
Amash is encouraging Americans to contact their representatives and sign a petition expressing their opposition to the NDAA bill, calling it “one of the most anti-liberty pieces of legislation of our lifetime.”
Click here to listen to the interview with Ron Paul in full.
