Source: NileBowie
For anyone paying attention,
there is no shortage of issues that fundamentally challenge the
underpinning moral infrastructure of American society and the values it
claims to uphold. Under the conceptual illusion of liberty, few things
are more sobering than the amount of Americans who will spend the rest
of their lives in an isolated correctional facility – ostensibly, being
corrected. The United States of America has long held the highest incarceration rate in the world,
far surpassing any other nation. For every 100,000 Americans, 743
citizens sit behind bars. Presently, the prison population in America
consists of more than six million people, a number exceeding the amount of prisoners held in the gulags of the former Soviet Union at any point in its history.
While miserable statistics
illustrate some measure of the ongoing ethical calamity occurring in the
detainment centers inside the land of the free, only a partial picture
of the broader situation is painted. While the country faces an
unprecedented economic and financial crisis, business is booming in
other fields – namely, the private prison industry. Like any other
business, these institutions are run for the purpose of turning a
profit. State and federal prisons are contracted out to private
companies who are paid a fixed amount to house each prisoner per day.
Their profits result from spending the minimum amount of state or
federal funds on each inmate, only to pocket the remaining capital. For
the corrections conglomerates of America, prosperity depends on housing
the maximum numbers of inmates for the longest potential time - as
inexpensively as possible.
By
allowing a profit-driven capitalist-enterprise model to operate over
institutions that should rightfully be focused on rehabilitation,
America has enthusiastically embraced a prison industrial complex. Under
the promise of maintaining correctional facilities at a lower cost due
to market competition, state and federal governments contract privately
run companies to manage and staff prisons, even allowing the groups to
design and construct facilities. The private prison industry is primarily led by two morally deficient entities, the Corrections
Corporation of America (CCA) and the GEO Group (formerly Wackenhut
Corrections Corporation). These companies amassed a combined revenue of over $2.9 billion in 2010, not without situating themselves in the center of political influence.
The number of people imprisoned under state and federal custody increased 772% percent between 1970 and 2009,
largely due to the incredible influence private corporations wield
against the American legal system. Because judicial leniency and
sentencing reductions threaten the very business models of these private
corporations, millions have been spent lobbying state officials and
political candidates in an effort to influence harsher “zero tolerance”
legislation and mandatory sentencing for many non-violent offenses.
Political action committees assembled by private correctional
corporations have lobbied over 3.3 million dollars to the political establishment since 2001. An annual report released by the CCA in 2010 reiterates the importance of influencing legislation:
“The
demand for our facilities and services could be adversely affected by
the relaxation of enforcement efforts, leniency in conviction or parole
standards and sentencing practices or through the decriminalization of
certain activities that are currently proscribed by our criminal laws.
For instance, any changes with respect to drugs and controlled
substances or illegal immigration could affect the number of persons
arrested, convicted, and sentenced, thereby potentially reducing demand
for correctional facilities to house them. Legislation has been proposed
in numerous jurisdictions that could lower minimum sentences for some
non-violent crimes and make more inmates eligible for early release
based on good behavior. Also, sentencing alternatives under
consideration could put some offenders on probation with electronic
monitoring who would otherwise be incarcerated. Similarly, reductions in
crime rates or resources dedicated to prevent and enforce crime could
lead to reductions in arrests, convictions and sentences requiring
incarceration at correctional facilities.”
Considering today’s private prison population is over 17 times larger than the figure two decades earlier,
the malleability of the judicial system under corporate influence is
clear. The Corrections Corporation of America is the first and largest
private prison company in the US, cofounded in 1983 by Tom Beasley,
former Chairman of the Tennessee Republican Party. The CCA entered the
market and overtly exploited Beasley’s political connections in an
attempt to exert control over the entire prison system of Tennessee.
Today, the company operates over sixty-five facilities and owns
contracts with the US Marshal Service, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) and the Bureau of Prisons. The GEO Group operates 118
detention centers throughout the United States, South Africa, UK,
Australia and elsewhere. Under its original name, the Wackenhut
Corrections Corporation was synonymous for the sadistic abuse of prisoners in its facilities, resulting in the termination of several contracts in 1999.
The political action committees assembled by private prison enterprises have also wielded incredible influence with respect to administering harsher immigration legislation. The number of illegal immigrants being incarcerated inside the United States is rising exponentially under Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), an
agency responsible for annually overseeing the imprisonment of 400,000
foreign nationals at the cost of over $1.9 billion on custody-related
operations. The agency has come under
heavy criticism for seeking to contract a 1,250-bed immigration
detention facility in Essex County, New Jersey to a private company that shares intimate ties to New Jersey's Governor, Chris Christie. Given the private prison industry’s dependence on immigration-detention contracts, the huge contributions of the prison lobby towards drafting Arizona’s recrementitious immigration law SB 1070 are all but unexpected. While the administration of Arizona’s Governor Jan Brewer is lined with former private prison lobbyists, its Department
of Corrections budget has been raised by $10 million, while all other
Arizona state agencies are subject to budget cuts in 2012’s fiscal year.
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this obstinate moral predicament presents itself in the private
contracting of prisoners and their role in assembling vast quantities
of military and commercial equipment. While the United States plunges
itself into each new manufactured conflict under a wide range of
fraudulent pretenses, it is interesting to note that all military
helmets, ammunition belts, bulletproof vests, ID tags, uniforms, tents,
bags and other equipment used by military occupation forces are produced by inmates in federal prisons across the US.
Giant multinational conglomerates and weapons manufacturers such as
Lockheed Martin and Raytheon Corporation employ federal prison labor to
cheaply assemble weapons components, only to sell them to the Pentagon
at premium prices. At the lowest, Prisoners earn 17 cents an hour to
assemble high-tech
electronic components for guided missile systems needed to produce
Patriot Advanced Capability 3 missiles and anti-tank projectiles.
In the past, political
mouthpieces of the United States have criticized countries such as China
and North Korea for their role in exploiting prisoner labor to create
commodity products such as women’s bras and artificial flowers for
export. Evidently, outsourcing the construction of the military
equipment responsible for innumerable civilian causalities to the
prisons of America warrants no such criticism from the military
industrial establishment. In utter derision toward the integrity of the common worker, prison inmates are exposed to toxic spent ammunition, depleted uranium dust and other chemicals when contracted to clean and reassemble tanks and military vehicles returned from combat.
Prison laborers receive no union protection, benefits or health and
safety protection when made to work in electronic recycling factories
where inmates are regularly exposed to lead, cadmium, mercury and
arsenic.
In
addition to performing tasks that can result in detrimental illnesses,
prison labor produces other military utilities such as night-vision
goggles, body armor, radio and communication devices, components for
battleship anti-aircraft guns, land mine sweepers and electro-optical
equipment. While this abundant source of low-cost manpower fosters
greater incentives for corporate stockholders to impose draconian
legislation on the majority of Americans who commit nonviolent offenses,
it’s hard to imagine such an innately colossal contradiction to the
nation’s official rhetoric, i.e. American values. Furthermore, prison
labor is employed not only in the assembly of complex components used in F-15 fighter jets and Cobra helicopters, it also supplies 98% of the entire market for equipment
assembly services, with similar statistics in regard to products such
as paints, stoves, office furniture, headphones, and speakers.
It
is some twisted irony that large sections of the workforce in America’s
alleged free-market are shackled in chains. Weapons manufactured in the
isolation of America’s prisons are the source of an exploitative cycle,
which leaves allied NATO member countries indebted to a
multibillion-dollar weapons industry at the behest of the U.S. State
Department and the Pentagon. Complete with its own trade exhibitions,
mail-order catalogs and investment houses on Wall Street, the eminence
of the private prison industry solidifies the ongoing corrosion of
American principles – principles that seem more abstract now, than the
day they were written.
Predictably, the potential profit of the prison labor boom has encouraged the foundations of US corporate society to move their production forces into American prisons.
Conglomerates such as IBM, Boeing, Motorola, Microsoft, AT&T,
Wireless, Texas Instrument, Dell, Compaq, Honeywell, Hewlett-Packard,
Nortel, Lucent Technologies, 3Com, Intel, Northern Telecom, TWA,
Nordstrom's, Revlon, Macy's, Pierre Cardin, Victoria’s Secret, and
Target have all begun mounting production operations in US prisons. Many
of these Fortune 500 conglomerates are corporate members of civil
society groups such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the
National Endowment for Democracy (NED). These think tanks are critical
toward influencing American foreign policy. Under the guise of democracy
promotion, these civil societies fund opposition movements and train
dissent groups in countries around the world in the interest of pro-US
regime change. With naked insincerity, the same companies that outsource
the production of their products to American prisons simultaneously sponsor civil societies that demanded the release of Myanmar’s Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest – an overly political effort in the on-going attempts to install a compliant regime in that country.
The
concept of privatizing prisons to reduce expenses comes at great cost
to the inmates detained, who are subjected to living in increasingly
squalid conditions in jail cells across America. In
2007, the Texas Youth Commission (TYC) was sent to a West Texas
juvenile prison run by GEO Group for the purpose of monitoring its
quality standards. The monitors sent by the TYC were subsequently fired for failing to report the sordid conditions they witnessed in the facility
while they awarded the GEO Group with an overall compliance score of
nearly 100%. Independent auditors later visited the facility and
discovered that inmates were forced to urinate or defecate in small
containers due to a lack of toilets in some of the cells. The
independent commission also noted in their list of reported findings
that the facility racially segregated prisoners and disciplined
Hispanics for speaking Spanish by denying their access to layers and
medical treatment. It was later discovered that the TYC monitors were employed by the GEO Group.
Troublingly, the Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility (WGYCF)
operated by the GEO Group in Mississippi has been subject to a
class-action lawsuit after reports that staff members were complicit in the beating and stabbing of a prisoner who consequently incurred permanent brain damage. The official compliant authored by the ACLU and Southern Poverty Law Center also highlights cases where the administration turned a blind eye to brutal cases of rape and torture within the facility.
The
first private prison models were introduced following the abolishment
of slavery after the American Civil War from 1861 to 1865, which saw
expansive prison farms replace slave plantations. Prisons of the day contracted groups of predominately African-American inmates to pick cotton and construct railroads
principally in southern states such as Alabama, Georgia and
Mississippi. In 2012, there are more African-Americans engrossed in the criminal-justice
system than any point during slavery. Throughout its history, the
American prison system has shared little with the concept of
rehabilitation. Like the post-Civil War prison farms, today’s system
functions to purport required labor, largely on a racially specific
basis. African-Americans consist of 40% of the prison population and are incarcerated seven times more often than whites, despite the fact that African-Americans make up only 12% of the national population. Once released, former inmates are barred from voting
in elections, denied educational opportunities and are legally
discriminated against in their efforts to find employment and housing. Few
can deny the targeting of underprivileged urban communities of color in
America’s failed War on Drugs. This phenomenon can largely be
contributed to the stipulations of its anti-drug legislation, which commanded maximum sentencing for possession of minute amounts of rock cocaine, a substance that floods poor inner-city black communities.
Unbeknown
to the vast majority of Americans, the US government has been actively
taking steps to modify the legal infrastructure of the country to allow
for a dramatic expansion of the domestic prison system at the expense of
civil rights. On December 31st, 2011, Barack Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) H.R. 1540.
Emulating the rouge military dictatorships the US Government has long
condemned in its rhetoric, the NDAA introduces a vaguely worded
legislation that allows for US citizens to be arbitrarily detained in
military detention without due process - might they be predictably be
deemed radical, conspiratorial or suspected of terrorism. In a climate
of rising public discontent, the establishment media has steadfastly
worked to blur the line between public activism and domestic extremism.
In addition to the world’s largest network of prison facilities, over 800 located detainment camps exist in all regions of the United States with varying maximum capacities.
Facing economic stagnation, many Americans have been detained in responder camps as a consequence of publically demonstrating
in accordance with the Occupy Wall Street movement launched in New York
City. Under the guise of protecting Americans from a largely contrived
and abstract threat of fundamentalist violence, citizens have been
denied the right of peaceful assembly and placed in detainment apparatuses, managed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Documents have been released by the American Civil Liberties Union detailing the Pentagon’s widespread monitoring of public demonstrations and the targeting of individual activists under threat of national security. Co-authored by Senator Joe Lieberman, the Enemy Expatriation Act (HR 3166)
gives the US government the power to detain nationals and revoke their
American citizenship under suspicion of behavior perceived as terrorism.
This
legislation becomes increasingly more dangerous as citizens can be
labeled domestic extremists based on their constitutionally protected
activism or personal political leanings. In January 2006, a contract to construct detention facilities for the Department of Homeland Security worth a maximum of $385 million was awarded to KBR, a subsidiary of Haliburton. Following the signing of NDAA earlier in 2012, leaked documents reveal that KBR is now seeking to staff its detention centers and award contracts for services such as catering,
temporary fencing and barricades, laundry and medical services, power
generation, and refuse collection. It would be reasonable to assume that
these facilities could be managed in partnership with private
corporations such as the GEO Group or the CCA, as many federal and state
penitentiaries privatize sections of their facilities to privately
owned companies. Declassified US Army documents originally drafted in 1997
divulge the existence of inmate labor camps inside US military
installations. It is all but unexpected that the relationship between
the upper echelons of government and the private prison enterprise will
grow increasingly more intimate in the current climate of prison
industrial legislation.
The
partnership between the United States government and its corporate
associates spans various industries however, they all seek the common
pursuit of profit irrespective of the moral and ethical consequence –
the human consequence. The increasing influence of the Prison Industrial
Complex towards official legislation and economic undertakings
signifies a reprehensible threat to basic human rights. Perhaps the
issuance of government legislation that leads offenders into detainment
for the benefit of private shareholders is the purest embodiment of
fascism, as cited in Mussolini’s vision of a Corporate State. Perhaps we all (this author included) fail to grasp the seriousness of these legislations and their implications on our lives.
Mumia
Abu-Jamal has spent over three decades on death row in the throngs of
the American prison system. Prior to his conviction in 1981 for the
murder of a white police officer, Jamal was a political activist and
President of the Philadelphia Association of Black Journalists. Critical
evidence vindicating Jamal was withheld from the trial prior to the
issuance of the death penalty. Forensic experts believe he was denied a
fair trial. On December 7, 2011, the
Philadelphia District Attorney announced that prosecutors would no
longer seek the death penalty for Jamal. He remains imprisoned for life
without parole and continues his work as a journalist from his jail cell
in Pennsylvania.
