Source: RT
This game of tit-for-tat can readily explode into all-out conflict, which would be a worst-case scenario not just for the region, but for the entire world.
Panetta, like his Russian counterpart, believes that the decision to attack Iran may be imminent.
Russia’s top military boss says an attack against Iran, which the
west suspects of developing nuclear weapons, could begin as early as
summer.
Thus far, tensions between Tehran and the west have been confined to
the battlefield of heated rhetoric. Russia’s highest ranking military
officer, however, predicts it may be just a matter of time before the
verbal grenades get real.
The Russian General Staff is closely watching the situation, and is
not ruling out the possibility of a coordinated attack on the Islamic
Republic, General Nikolai Makarov, head of the Russian General Staff,
told reporters on Tuesday.
“Iran is a sore spot,” Makarov noted.“I think a decision will be made by the summer.”
If Makarov is correct in his estimations, the situation in the region
– overwhelmed as it is with political crises and war – could spin
rapidly out of control. Indeed, some are warning that an attack on Iran
could trigger a dangerous game of dominoes across the Middle East,
possibly even culminating in another world war.
In the slide towards escalating violence, there have been a string of
disturbing incidents, including alleged cyber attacks against Iran, as
well as the downing of a sophisticated US drone, which Iran says it
guided to the ground after electronically hacking into the vehicle.
Then there are the mysterious assassinations.
In January, Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, 31, who supervised a department at
the Natanz uranium enrichment facility, was killed by a car bomb in
northern Tehran.
Exactly two years earlier, Masoud Ali Mohammadi, a senior physics
professor at Tehran University, was killed when a bomb-rigged motorcycle
exploded beside his car as he was about to leave for work.
Iran blamed Israeli intelligence for the killings.
In the latest ratcheting up of tensions, Israel on Monday blamed Iran
for masterminding attacks against Israeli embassies in Tbilisi and New
Delhi.
This game of tit-for-tat can readily explode into all-out conflict, which would be a worst-case scenario not just for the region, but for the entire world.
In November, US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta warned that military
action against Iran could have “unintended consequences” in the region.
Panetta, like his Russian counterpart, believes that the decision to attack Iran may be imminent.
Washington Post columnist David Ignatius wrote earlier this month
that Panetta “believes there is a strong likelihood that Israel will
strike Iran in April, May or June before Iran enters what Israelis
described as a ‘zone of immunity’ to commence building a nuclear bomb.”
Russia is adamantly opposed to any military action against Iran,
though Moscow has supported UN Security Council sanctions against Tehran
in an effort to force the Islamic Republic to cooperate with the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is working
overtime to get US President Barack Obama onboard the campaign against
Iran. And it will not hurt his fierce lobbying efforts that Washington
is preparing for presidential elections in November.
Thanks to the hawkish neoconservative philosophy that has hijacked
traditional conservative thinking (which, to his credit, Ron Paul
genuinely represents), President Obama can expect to be accused of
“going weak on Iran” if he proposes anything short of war.
Thus, Russia’s top military commander may be right: the overstretched
US military and its budget-broke NATO allies may find themselves
fighting yet another senseless war with unknown consequences very soon.