Source: The Daily Bell
A Game As Old As History: The Globalist Hand Behind The Iranian
Mullahs ... Iran's fundamentalist clerics have never been independent
and militant vis-à-vis the West, but rather have remained subservient to
U.S.-British geopolitical interests and goals in the region while
pretending to represent the people of Iran and the religion of Islam. − Samam Mohammadi/The Excavator/PrisonPlanet
Dominant Social Theme: Islam is an enemy of the West. Iran is Islam. Iran is the enemy. Bomb it.
Free-Market Analysis: Wow, an important article by
Samam Mohammadi based on other equally important articles that Mohammadi
cites. He basically lays out a case that Iran is a phony US enemy and
that the Iranian Revolution was actually Western-inspired.
There are few higher callings than this – writing articles that seem
to debunk the "directed history" charades of Money Power while revealing
the grim skull-like grin lurking bloodily beneath the surface.
We've pointed out many times now that we believe much of what passes
for the Western historical narrative – especially over the past few
hundred years – is what we call "directed history." That is, the power elite
that today seeks to run the world has been creating economic, political
and military incidents that it then enshrines as "accidents of
history."
But they are not accidents of history. They are seemingly
deliberately planned provocations that result, almost always, in
increased globalization. It is the Internet that shows us this fearful
pattern and seemingly reveals to us the irrevocable and breathtaking
influence of Money Power.
Once these incidents have been created, the great families that run the world's central banks
turn to their bought-and-paid-for media and court historians to write
narratives that enshrine their globalist narratives via magazines,
novels, textbooks and, ultimately, historical presentations.
To add credibility, they invent and create literary and historical prizes including the Nobel Prize. Then they dress up their narratives in the entertaining cloak of Hollywood movie-dom. It is an all-inclusive "matrix."
In Iraq, the US "embedded" reputable journalists with the troops. But
the result of such reporting was merely fact-based. It seemed genuine
but did not deal with the larger issues of the war or its inception – or
even Saddam Hussein's past history with Western intelligence that, for all intents and purposes, may have placed him in power to begin with.
"I know history will be kind to me," Winston Churchill
reportedly said, "because I intend to write it." This phrase,
apocryphal or not, is good for a chuckle but history, it turns out, is
far more serious. The wars of the 20th century alone provide us with a
toll of horror that is difficult to imagine. The number of people killed
– fairly directly – by the state in the 20th century is in the area of
150 million, apparently.
Try to explain World War I, please. Or how about World War II? Or the USSR? Or China? Turns out in every case the Anglosphere power elite that wants to run the world apparently "funded" the "other" side. There were massive investments made in Hitler's
Germany right up until the war, and then apparently afterwards as well.
Western elites funded the USSR "Reds" and probably Mao and his cadres.
Of course, this is the way of the world. Money Power's directed
history is surely not a modern infestation. We are simply not confident
in our modest abilities to make even hypothetical pronouncements about
what happened several hundreds years ago or longer.
But we can guess. We figure that what works today has been working on
and off for thousands of years. But the closer it gets, the more
recognizable it is. The mechanism is more clearly visible.
And thus we are not surprised that more and more is emerging about
the phony nature of the Iranian threat. We are not even surprised at the
amount of detail that is becoming clear. Several years ago we pointed
out reports that Iran's clerical revolutionary Rouhollah Mousavi
Khomeini's father was British MI6. There are other apparent anomalies.
It is important to note that such revelations are a direct result of the Internet – the Internet Reformation,
if you will. It is NOT a hypothetical concept. We've also pointed out
that damage control, when it comes to the Internet, is exceptionally
difficult.
The Internet is a process not an episode. It mimics the first information revolution sparked by the Gutenberg Press.
Ultimately, the ramifications, in our view, will be just as resonant.
At this point, no matter what the powers-that-be try to do, it's
probably too late.
The evidence of the power elite's failing dominant social themes
is all around us. And now information about the Anglosphere's
incredible, mind-boggling war-time lies are becoming clearer. What is
emerging about Iran is stranger than any James Bond fiction or CIA
narrative.
Once again we see Western power elites creating the enemy they then
claim to wish to destroy. Really ... we don't know of anything in modern
history that compares to this! We hardly have the words to describe it.
The US and its allies are threatening to become involved in a MAJOR
war at the same time that CREDIBLE EVIDENCE is apparently emerging that
the people in charge of the West, certainly behind the scenes, have
SUPPORTED THE ENEMY.
Thanks, DARPA. That was a swell "Net" you invented.
Of course, it's not just Iran. We never thought we would conclude
that the entire recent past of the human race was apparently a kind of
fictional device, a made-up narrative designed to increase globalism and
bring the backers of the narrative ever more power and wealth. We still
find it hard to believe.
What's HARDER to believe is the malevolence marshaled by this sort of
directed history. The top people – and we figure there are only a
handful (apparently worth trillions, by the way, thanks to the central
banks they control) – really don't care much about human life. They
create wars the way other people create arguments. Or that's how it
seems.
We've covered the emergent narrative of Western involvement in the
Iranian mess in some detail but we did so within the context of our
textual approach, through analysis of dominant social themes. These
themes yield patterns that are becoming increasingly clear as the flow
of information posted on the Internet continues to build.
The information doesn't need to be "alternative" in nature, by the
way. Once one knows what patterns to note, even mainstream events,
properly reported, can prove useful. This is another complication for
those attempting to control the 'Net's newsflow. The incredible
aggregation it offers is nearly as important as the alternative points
of view. Here are a few of our articles over the years about the Iranian
hoax:
This past week, as we note in our initial quote, Mohammadi provides
us a useful additional resource by pulling together the growing
literature exposing the West's Iranian manipulations. He cites authors
who are digging up more definitive details ...
Francisco Gil-White's series of investigative articles at his
websiteHistorical and Investigative Research goes into great detail
about the complicated relationship between the Anglo-American shadow
ruling elite and the Iranian mullahs. His investigations feature many
links to news articles and other historical material that prove his
thesis that "US policy towards Iran has been pro-Islamist since 1979,
and that the Islamist Iranian mullahs have been US assets from the
start," (The Big Picture: US policy towards Iran in the broadest
historical perspective, January 5, 2006).
In "The Big Picture," article, Gil-White writes that "the basic
structure of the relationship between the US and Iran did not change in
1979, with the exception that the puppet government in Iran, since 1979,
has pretended in public to be an enemy of the US ruling elite."
According to this narrative, the Iranian mullahs were hand-picked
in the late 1970s to rule over a government that is still in a colonial
relationship with America and Britain. The research done by Iranian
political dissident Fara Mansoor, which I have highlighted before, backs
up this narrative.
Mansoor said that elements in the U.S. intelligence and foreign
policy elite gained knowledge of the Shah's cancer in 1975 after General
Hossein Fardoust, the Shah's right-hand man and longtime friend,
informed then U.S. ambassador to Iran, Richard Helms.
The knowledge of the Shah's cancer was political and intelligence
gold, and it fell into the greedy hands of Helms, who was quick to use
it to outmaneuver his political enemies abroad and at home. Helms was
well experienced in secret espionage and engineering back-dealing
conspiracies, having played a key role in the assassination of President
John F. Kennedy and the subsequent CIA cover-up.
I've summarized some of his main findings in my articles: The
British And U.S. Governments Installed Khomeini Into Power In 1979; A
Rigged Revolution: How The Shadow CIA-MI6 Network Put Khomeini And
Militant Islamists in Power; and Hostage To False Flag Terror: The Link
Between The October Surprise And The September Surprise.
Also, read Harry V. Martin's article from 1995 called, "The real
Iranian hostage story from the files of Fara Mansoor," and listen to
radio host Dave Emory's 1993 interview with Mansoor on YouTube.
This is so very important. Never, so far as we know, has a credible
alternative history circulated while the elites were actively engaged in
contemporaneous agitation.
So here is a question for those who will immediately claim this is
further evidence that the 'Net is being "used" by the elites to
disseminate only information they "choose." Our question is, "Why?"
Why would the Anglosphere power elite choose to circulate such
damning facts at the same time as they embarked upon an effort to paint
Iran as a terrible enemy of the West – and militant Islam generally?
The answer to us is obvious: These stage-managed conflicts are
increasingly being revealed nearly as fast as the elites create them.
There are those who will maintain that such exposure does little to
harm the larger malevolent mechanism. But, in fact, such revelations are
incredibly damaging. We cannot establish it for a fact but we are
fairly well convinced of a kind of operative human "hive mind."
For some reason, information disseminated in one place has ripples –
ramifications – far beyond its immediate absorption. This is the
phenomenon that the elites are struggling with.
Call it the Emperor's New Clothes phenomenon. A single child pointing
out the obvious can have a convulsive effect on the larger polity and
populace. The emperor, you know, continued his parade but he was abashed
and ashamed. Everyone knew, somehow.
Given what we are now learning, here's another question: What is more
important than some of the journalism taking place on the Internet at
"alternative news" websites? (Not all of such information is credible,
of course, and some of it, in fact, is misinformation. You will have to
sort through it yourself.)
It's really amazing. In only a few short years, in our humble
opinion, a small group of intrepid, amateur sleuths, using only Internet
tools and the patterns they reveal, have exposed to us history's
greatest hoax – the directed history that a powerful handful of elite
families have secretly been inflicting on everybody else.
This is an ineffably important insight for anyone who wants to live
their life within the larger context of human civilization – such as it
is or pretends to be. Why should we care? Because we ought to understand
our place within life's larger context. "Know thyself," Socrates said.
Conclusion: We may not wish to understand. We may regret the journey. It may sadden or repel us. But, by God, let's not stop! Let us know!
