 Source: Global Research
Source: Global ResearchDevon DB
A new bill, HR 347, the Federal
 Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011, also known as
 the “Trespassing Bill,” is soon to be signed into law by President 
Obama. This bill effectively criminalizes protest and will hurt protest 
groups and movements such as Occupy quite hard.
The bill
 as states that anyone who knowingly “enters or remains in any 
restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so” with 
the “intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government 
business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive 
conduct in or [in] proximity to, any restricted building or grounds” or 
“impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or 
official functions” will be punished with a fine or “or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both.” (emphasis added)
There
 are already many problems with the bill as it does not attempt to 
define what “imped[ing] or disrupt[ing] the orderly conduct of 
government business or official functions” is, nor does it specify what 
“government business” is or what an “official function” is. This 
vagueness will allow for the US government to effectively stifle protest
 and free speech, thus criminalizing such actions like the upcoming Occupy Chicago anti-NATO/G-8 protests.
 In addition to this, such a law will make it impossible for Americans 
to exercise their First Amendment rights when “government business” is 
being attended to or “official functions” are occurring.
Unsurprisingly, only three people voted against the measure: Paul
 Broun (R-GA-10), Justin Amash (R-MI-3) and Ron Paul (R-TX-14). This law
 would allow federal law enforcement “to bring these charges against 
Americans engaged in political protests anywhere in the country, and 
violators will face criminal penalties that include imprisonment for up 
to 10 years.” HR 347 will is ripe for abuse, as the NYPD has, as of recent, assumed the notion that taking photos and videotaping is a form of disorderly conduct. 
The fact that only three people in the House, all Republicans and absolutely no Democrats (see the voting list here), only shows just how both parties are just two sides of the same coin. 
This law comes at the heels of the US government having debated over whether or not to indefinitely detain US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder- the Obama administration’s version of John Yoo, arguing that the President can assassinate US citizens without providing any evidence whatsoever to anyone.
