Source: RT
As some European leaders demonstrate a celebratory mood over the violent death of Colonel Gaddafi, they are no less terrorists themselves, claims international consultant and author Adrian Salbuchi.
As some European leaders demonstrate a celebratory mood over the violent death of Colonel Gaddafi, they are no less terrorists themselves, claims international consultant and author Adrian Salbuchi.
Salbuchi said Gaddafi’s death was undoubtedly a message for the whole world, as it is not just about Libya.
“We
are seeing how Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State expressed it very
clearly: ‘We came, we saw, he died,’ and then started laughing. This is
a message to the world of how this new world order model actually
works,” he stated. “When they decide to change the regime, they
do so with the utmost violence, and it is a whole model. First they
target a country by calling it a rogue state; then they support local
terrorists and call them freedom fighters; then they bring death and
destruction upon civilians and they call it UN sanctions. Then they
spread lies and call it the International Community’s opinion expressed
by the Western media. Then they invade and control the country and call
it liberation and finally they steal appetizing oil and call it foreign
investment and reconstruction,” Salbuchi explained.
At the
moment Western powers are hailing a democratic future for Libya. When
Saddam Hussein was captured in 2003 the US also thought it was all
over – but it had only just begun. And according to Salbuchi, it is
going to be the same, or even worse, for Libya.
“I think one
of the reasons why Gaddafi’s country has been invaded and he has been
killed is because he had plans to introduce the gold dinar as a golden
currency that could very easily have become a major currency at least in
North Africa and in the oil market,” he said. “Don’t forget
Libya has the ninth-largest oil reserve in the world and the main oil
reserve in all of Africa, so I think this definitely smells of oil and
greed on the part of Western companies. They are just using this to
justify they have supported the worst terrorists probably because in the
White House and Palais de l'Élysée in France, and at 10 Downing Street,
we also have very high-class terrorists and mafias running those
countries and the better part of the world,” he pointed out.
He added the US, France, Britain and NATO should be held accountable for the sectarian violence, should it take place in Libya.
“In
any country, Libya included, there is always about a half of the
population that is against the ongoing government. Should we also be
invading Greece because of the way they are handling their own internal
divisions?” he posited.
A rebel-assisted victory in Libya will not mark the end of NATO's interest in the country, Salbuchi emphasized.
“This
is just the beginning and part of global regime change. This means
orange alert for Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador and definitely red alert
for Syria and Iran. This is the kind of democracy US, France and
Britain want for the whole world,” he concluded.
NATO and
the US in particular are interested in a long-term intervention in the
North African country. They would have designs on involvement in Libya’s
domestic affairs for decades, believes Mazin Qumsiyeh, a professor from
Bethlehem University.
“Their aim is to control Libya and
effect the change in Libya to make it easier to reinstitute an American
base in Libya which existed until 1969, as well as to control the oil
industry in Libya and the privatization of the country,” professor stated.
This
is hypocritical from the part of the US, as they earlier had Gaddafi as
their ally. Colonel was known as the CIA collaborator, added Qumsiyeh.
