Source: Information Clearing House
Phillip Weiss
 In Saturday night's Republican 
debate, Mitt Romney gave a defiant statement about Iran: he will stop it
 from getting nukes by any means, Obama won't. Yesterday Obama sought to
 parry Romney, saying that he is taking no option off the table.
In Saturday night's Republican 
debate, Mitt Romney gave a defiant statement about Iran: he will stop it
 from getting nukes by any means, Obama won't. Yesterday Obama sought to
 parry Romney, saying that he is taking no option off the table. 
Phillip Weiss
 In Saturday night's Republican 
debate, Mitt Romney gave a defiant statement about Iran: he will stop it
 from getting nukes by any means, Obama won't. Yesterday Obama sought to
 parry Romney, saying that he is taking no option off the table.
In Saturday night's Republican 
debate, Mitt Romney gave a defiant statement about Iran: he will stop it
 from getting nukes by any means, Obama won't. Yesterday Obama sought to
 parry Romney, saying that he is taking no option off the table. 
Are we witnessing a primary between Romney and Obama right now, for the support of the Israel lobby? 
                        
                        
I think so. Romney's braintrust includes neocons
 like Robert Kagan and Dan Senor, while David Brooks, David Frum and 
Bill Kristol have all said good things about Romney. Dennis Ross and 
Stuart Levey have both left the Obama administration, hurting his 
standing in the Israel lobby. Don't forget, the lobby defected from Bush
 to Clinton in '91 over settlements; and its fundraising abilities 
helped assure Clinton's election over the incumbent (as Max Blumenthal's
 post at AlAkhbar today points out).
Jews are sure to vote by a majority for Obama; but as a Forward package this
 week shows, Obama's polling numbers are sliding among Jews-- from 83 
percent approval in early '09 to 54 percent in September. (Compared to 
overall #s going from 66 to 41.)
Neocons call on hawkish Jews, who tend to be older
 (p. 3 of that poll: overwhelmingly opposing a Palestinian state), and 
therefore wealthier.  The fundraising question is crucial. Slate's 
editor David Plotz has questioned the loyalty of Jewish donors. So have the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, talking about "Jewish donors--a major fundraising constituency for the president." The Hill said that Obama's big Wall Street fundraisers were turning to Romney, and I pointed out that most of the donors named by the Hill care about Israel.
New York Magazine's John Heilemann echoes the point:
[A]mong the high-dollar Jewish donors who were essential to fueling the great Obama money machine last time around, stories of dismay and disaffection are legion. “There’s no question,” says one of the president’s most prolific fund-raisers. “We have a big-time Jewish problem.”
So 
again I ask, isn't this what the dogfight over Iran policy is? Obama and
 Romney are squaring off in an Israel lobby primary, to try and gain 
Jewish financial support, anticipating the big race ahead. The 
neoconservatives and J Street
 are arguing over who can deliver that support. Politics never stays in 
the same place, but somehow I fear that hawkish voices will dominate my 
community once again.
