Source: Boiling Frogs Post
William Engdahl
 Since
 around October last year, the price of crude oil on world futures 
markets has exploded. Different people have different explanations. The 
most common one is the belief in financial markets that a war between 
either Israel and Iran or the USA and Iran or all three is imminent. 
Another camp argues that the price is rising unavoidably because the 
world has passed what they call “Peak Oil”—the point on an imaginary 
Gaussian Bell Curve at which half of all world known oil reserves have 
been depleted and the remaining oil will decline in quantity at an 
accelerating pace with rising price.
Since
 around October last year, the price of crude oil on world futures 
markets has exploded. Different people have different explanations. The 
most common one is the belief in financial markets that a war between 
either Israel and Iran or the USA and Iran or all three is imminent. 
Another camp argues that the price is rising unavoidably because the 
world has passed what they call “Peak Oil”—the point on an imaginary 
Gaussian Bell Curve at which half of all world known oil reserves have 
been depleted and the remaining oil will decline in quantity at an 
accelerating pace with rising price. 

   
 The
 Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA) was drafted by the 
man who today is President Obama’s Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner. 
The  CFMA in effect gave over-the-counter (between financial 
institutions) derivatives trading in energy futures free reign, absent 
any US Government supervision, as a result of the financially 
influential lobbying pressure of the Wall Street banks.  Oil and other 
energy products were exempt under what came to be called the “Enron 
Loophole.”
The
 Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA) was drafted by the 
man who today is President Obama’s Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner. 
The  CFMA in effect gave over-the-counter (between financial 
institutions) derivatives trading in energy futures free reign, absent 
any US Government supervision, as a result of the financially 
influential lobbying pressure of the Wall Street banks.  Oil and other 
energy products were exempt under what came to be called the “Enron 
Loophole.” 
 Current
 estimates are that speculators, that is futures traders such as banks 
and hedge funds who have no intent of taking physical delivery but only 
of turning a paper profit, today control some 80 percent of the energy 
futures market, up from 30 percent a decade ago.  CFTC Chair Gary 
Gensler, perhaps to maintain a patina of credibility while his agency 
ignored the legal mandate of Congress,  declared last year in reference 
to oil markets that “huge inflows of speculative money create a 
self-fulfilling prophecy that drives up commodity prices.” [2] In early March, Kuwaiti Oil MinisterMinister
 Hani Hussein said in an interview broadcast on state television, “Under
 the supply and demand theory, oil prices today are not justified.”[3]
Current
 estimates are that speculators, that is futures traders such as banks 
and hedge funds who have no intent of taking physical delivery but only 
of turning a paper profit, today control some 80 percent of the energy 
futures market, up from 30 percent a decade ago.  CFTC Chair Gary 
Gensler, perhaps to maintain a patina of credibility while his agency 
ignored the legal mandate of Congress,  declared last year in reference 
to oil markets that “huge inflows of speculative money create a 
self-fulfilling prophecy that drives up commodity prices.” [2] In early March, Kuwaiti Oil MinisterMinister
 Hani Hussein said in an interview broadcast on state television, “Under
 the supply and demand theory, oil prices today are not justified.”[3]
      
# # # #   
William Engdahl
‘The Key Oil Derivatives Insiders are Laughing All the Way to the Bank’
Both the war danger and peak oil 
explanations are off base. As in the astronomic price run-up in the 
Summer of 2008 when oil in futures markets briefly hit $147 a barrel, 
oil today is rising because of the speculative pressure on oil futures 
markets from hedge funds and major banks such as Citigroup, JP Morgan 
Chase and most notably, Goldman Sachs, the bank always present when 
there are big bucks to be won for little effort betting on a sure 
thing.  They’re getting a generous assist from the US Government agency 
entrusted with regulating financial derivatives, the Commodity Futures 
Trading Corporation (CFTC).    
Source: oilnergy.com
Since the beginning of October 2011, 
some six months ago, the price of Brent Crude Oil Futures on the ICE 
Futures exchange has risen from just below $100 a barrel to over $126 
per barrel, a rise of more than 25%. Back in 2009 oil was $30. 
Yet demand for crude oil  worldwide 
is not rising, but rather is declining in the same period.  The 
International Energy Agency (IEA) reports that the world oil supply rose
 by 1.3 million barrels a day in the last three months of 2011 while 
world demand increased  by just over half that during that same time 
period.Gasoline usage is  down in the US by 8%, Europe by 22% and even 
in China. Recession across much of the European Union, a deepening 
recession/depression in the United States and slowdown in Japan have 
reduced global oil demand while new discoveries are coming online daily 
and countries like Iraq are increasing supply after years of war. A 
brief spike in China’s oil purchases  in January and February had to do 
with a decision last December to build their Strategic Petroleum Reserve
 and is expected to return to more normal import levels by the end of 
this month. 
Why then the huge spike in oil prices? 
Playing with ‘paper oil’
A brief look at how today’s “paper 
oil” markets function is useful. Since Goldman Sachs bought J. Aron 
& Co., a savvy commodities trader in the 1980’s, trading in crude 
oil has gone from a domain of buyers and sellers of spot or physical oil
 to a market where unregulated speculation in oil futures, bets on a 
price of a given crude on a specific future date, usually in 30 or 60 or
 90 days, and not actual supply-demand of physical oil determine daily 
oil prices. 
In recent years, a Wall 
Street-friendly (and Wall Street financed) US Congress has passed 
several laws to help the banks that were interested in trading oil 
futures, among them one that allowed the bankrupt Enron to get away with
 a financial ponzi scheme worth billions in 2001 before it went 
bankrupt. 
In 2008 during a popular outrage 
against Wall Street banks for causing  the financial crisis, Congress 
finally passed a law over the veto of President George Bush to “close 
the Enron Loophole.” And as of January 2011, under the Dodd-Frank Wall 
Street Reform act, the CFTC was given authority to impose position caps 
on oil traders beginning in January 2011. 
Curiously, these limits have not yet 
been implemented by the CFTC. In a recent interview  Senator Bernie 
Sanders of Vermont stated that the CFTC doesn’t “have the will” to enact
 these limits and “needs to obey the law.” He adds, “What we need to do 
is…limit the amount of oil any one company can control on the oil 
futures market. The function of these speculators is not to use oil but 
to make profits from speculation, drive prices up and sell.”[1]
 While he has made noises of trying to close the loopholes, CFTC 
Chairman Gary Gensler has yet to do so. Notably,Gensler is a former 
executive of, you guessed, Goldman Sachs. The enforcement by the CFTC 
remains non-existent.
The role of key banks along with oil 
majors such as BP in manipulating a new oil price bubble since last 
Autumn, one detached from the physical reality of supply-demand 
calculations of real oil barrels, is being noted by a number of sources.
 
A ‘gambling casino…’
Michael Greenberger, professor at the
 University of Maryland School of Law and a former CFTC regulator who 
has tried to draw public attention to the consequences of the US 
Government’s decisions to allow unbridled speculation and manipulation 
of energy prices by big banks and funds, recently noted, “There are 50 
studies showing that speculation adds an incredible premium to the price
 of oil, but somehow that hasn’t seeped into the conventional wisdom,” 
Greenberger said. “Once you have the market dominated by speculators, 
what you really have is a gambling casino.” [4]
The result of a permissive US 
Government regulation of oil markets has created the ideal conditions 
whereby a handful of strategic banks and financial institutions, 
interestingly the same ones dominating world trade in oil derivatives 
and the same ones who own the shares of the major oil trading exchange 
in London, ICE Futures, are able to manipulate huge short-term swings in
 the price we pay for oil or gasoline or countless other petroleum-based
 products. 
We are in the midst of one of those 
swings now, one made worse by the Israeli saber-rattling rhetoric over 
Iran’s nuclear program. Let me go on record stating categorically my 
firm conviction that Israel will not engage in a direct war against Iran
 nor will Washington. But the effect of the war rhetoric is to create 
the ideal backdrop for a massive speculative spike in oil. Some analysts
 speak of oil at $150 by summer. 
Hillary Clinton just insured that the
 oil price will continue to ride high for months on fears of a war with 
Iran by delivering a new ultimatum to Iran on the nuclear issue in talks
 with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov, “by year’s end or else…” [5]
Curiously, one of the real drivers of
 the current oil price bubble is the Obama Administration’s economic 
sanctions recently imposed on oil transactions of the Central Bank of 
Iran. By pressuring Japan, South Korea and the EU not to import Iranian 
oil or face punitive actions, Washington has reportedly forced a huge 
drop in oil supply from Iran to the world market in recent weeks, giving
 a turbo boost to the Wall Street derivatives play on oil. In a recent 
OpEd in the London Financial Times, Ian Bremmer and David 
Gordon of the Eurasia Group wrote, “… removing too much Iranian oil from
 the world’s energy supply could cause an oil price spike  that would 
halt the recovery even as it does some financial damage to Iran. For 
perhaps the first time, sanctions have the potential to be ‘too 
successful,’ hurting the sanctioners as much as the sanctioned.” 
Iran is shipping 300,000 to 400,000 a
 barrels a day less than its usual 2.5 million barrels a day, according 
to Bloomberg. Last week, the US Energy Information Administration said 
in a report that much of that Iranian oil isn’t being exported because 
insurers won’t issue policies for the shipments.[6]
The issue of unbridled and 
unregulated oil derivatives speculation by a handful of big banks is not
 a new issue. A June 2006 US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on 
Investigations report on “The Role of Market Speculation in rising oil 
and gas prices,” noted, “…there is substantial evidence supporting the 
conclusion that the large amount of speculation in the current market 
has significantly increased prices.”
The report pointed out that the 
Commodity Futures Trading Trading Commission had been mandated by 
Congress to ensure that prices on the futures market reflect the laws of
 supply and demand rather than manipulative practices or excessive 
speculation. The US Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) states, “Excessive 
speculation in any commodity under contracts of sale of such commodity 
for future delivery . . . causing sudden or unreasonable fluctuations or
 unwarranted changes in the price of such commodity, is an undue and 
unnecessary burden on interstate commerce in such commodity.” Further, 
the CEA directs the CFTC to establish such trading limits “as the 
Commission finds are necessary to diminish, eliminate, or prevent such 
burden.”[7]
Where is the CFTC now that we need 
such limits? As Senator Sanders correctly noted, the CFTC appears to 
ignore the law to the benefit of Goldman Sachs and Wall Street friends 
who dominate the trade in oil futures.
The moment that it becomes clear that
 the Obama Administration has acted to prevent any war with Iran by 
opening various diplomatic back-channels and that Netanyahu is merely 
trying to use the war threats to enhance his tactical position to horse 
trade with an Obama Administration he despises, the price of oil is 
poised to drop like a stone within days. Until then, the key oil 
derivatives insiders are laughing all the way to the bank. The effect of
 the soaring oil prices on fragile world economic growth, especially in 
countries like China is very negative as well.
F. William Engdahl is author of A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics in the New World Order. He is a contributing author at BFP and may be contacted through his website at www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net where this article was originally published. 
Endnotes:
[1]Morgan Korn, Oil Speculators Must Be Stopped and the CFTC “Needs to Obey the Law”: Sen. Bernie Sanders, Daily Ticker, March 7, 2012, accessed in http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/oil-speculators-must-stopped-ctfc-needs-obey-law-182903332.html
[2] Ibid.
[2] Ibid.
[3] UpstreamOnline, Kuwait’s
 oil minister believes current world oil prices are not justified, 
adding that the Gulf state’s current production rate will not affect its
 level of strategic reserves, 12 March 2012, accessed in http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article1236944.ece
[4] Peter S. Goodman, Behind Gas Price Increases, Obama’s Failure To Crack Down On Speculators,  The Huffington Post, March 15, 2012, accessed in http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-s-goodman/gas-price-increase_b_1346035.html
[5] Tom Parfitt,  US ‘tells Russia to warn Iran of last chance’ , The Telegraph, 14 March 2012, accessed in http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/9142688/US-tells-Russia-to-warn-Iran-of-last-chance.html
[6] Steve Levine, Obama administration brushes off oil price impact of Iran sanctions, Foreign Policy, March 8, 2012, accessed in http://oilandglory.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/03/08/obama_administration_brushes_off_oil_price_impact_of_iran_sanctions
[7] F. William Engdahl, ‘Perhaps 60% of today’s oil price is pure speculation’, Global Research, May 2, 2008, accessed in http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8878.
