 Source: RT
Source: RT
Presidential hopeful Ron Paul has publically attacked the Obama 
administration’s abolishment of due process in a new editorial, calling 
the move a turning point in American history.
Responding to Attorney General Eric Holder’s recent justification for
 the extrajudicial killings of three American citizens on foreign soil, 
Republican Party candidate Ron Paul has penned a scathing op-ed 
condemning the White House for circumventing the US Constitution. 
Earlier this month Holder spoke at Chicago’s Northwestern Law School to 
discuss last year’s execution of alleged terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki and 
two other US-born clerics in Yemen, a decision he says the White House 
still defends despite criticism from citizens and lawmakers alike. 
Although
 both US President Barack Obama and the CIA signed off on the airstrike 
that killed the American citizens, Washington has been relatively quiet 
on the matter until Holder spoke earlier this month. 
After 
Attorney General Holder justified the assassination of Americans, a 
congressional inquiry revealed that Robert Mueller, director of the 
Federal Bureau of Investigation, wasn’t certain
 that the same laws could be applied to killing Americans on US soil. 
With the FBI and Oval Office both hiding behind vague verbiage to allow 
the assassination of their own citizens, Ron Paul is critiquing what he 
calls a complete disregard of the Constitution.
“It is 
particularly bizarre to hear the logic of the administration claiming 
the right to target its citizens according to some secret selection 
process, when we justified our attacks against Iraq and Libya because 
their leaders supposedly were targeting their own citizens,” writes Rep. Paul. “We also now plan a covert war against Syria for the same reason.”
The
 congressman adds in his explanation that he is all for justice brought 
on those that threaten America or its people, but that the US Department
 of Justice has — and should continue — to view these issues on a 
case-by-case basis. On the contrary, argues Paul, it seems as if the 
president puts himself above all other branches of the federal 
government, essentially eliminating the system of checks and balances 
constructed by America’s forefathers.
Holder, says Paul, 
“tells us that this is not a violation of the due process requirements 
of our Constitution because the President himself embodies ‘due process’
 as he unilaterally determines who is to be targeted. As Holder said, ‘a
 careful and thorough executive branch review of the facts in a case 
amounts to “due process.”’ That means that the administration believes 
it is the President himself who is to be the judge, jury and 
executioner.”
“Our civilian court system, with the 
guarantee of real due process, judicial review, and a fair trial, is our
 strength, not a weakness,” writes Rep. Paul. “It is not an 
impediment to be sidestepped in the push for convictions or 
assassinations, but rather a process that guarantees that fundamental 
right to be considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.”
After
 the CIA ordered and executed a “targeted kill” on Awlaki and alleged 
al-Qaeda operative Samir Khan last year, Ron Paul responded the same day
 to condemn the assassinations. "Nobody knows if he ever killed anybody," Paul said at time. "If the American people accept this blindly and casually…I think that's sad." 
Now
 that the US has formally acknowledged that it stands by the killing 
months later, the congressman seems to be even more concerned with the 
turn America is taking, describing Holder’s explanation as something “history likely will record as a turning point.”
